atsch seriously man just log off, you sound just as ******ed claiming im a fan of a fighter i dont even like all the while repeating the same mindless dribble benjamin tried to pass off as something worthy of consideration. just enjoy pac beating up broken down old men and be happy, why cant you be happy?
sorry, here on planet earth we take the guy who has a strap, in his prime, and undefeated. not a man who's old, strapless, and coming off two horrible performances. OOHHH BUT WAIT!! BUT WAIT!! HE LANDED TWO PUNCHES ON FLOYD! HE'S THE MAN!!! just run back to pacland and enjoy the myth that is manny pacquiao
Dumbest statement ever posted on this forum. While you're using INACTIVE and long-retired boxers, why not go with a big name Hollywood actor? Pacquiao-Pitt! Pacquiao-Cruise! atsch Pac has at minimum THREE All-Time Greats on resume, and he's blasted out big names in the sport. Pacquiao has done great things, Berto hasn't done ****. With 2-3 fights left in his career, why waste it on a no-name and risk losing millions? You can argue that Clottey is unknown, but his resume is still 10X what Berto's is. There are no freebies in life, stupid mother****er. :deal
Didn't Roach/Pac said he'll still be fighting for 3 more years? At least that's what was reported. So if that's the case, he can fight all these 3 and all the names you want just fill in the blanks. I prefer he fights Marquez now although if he's gonna fight both anyway, it's better to fight shane now rather than later since he's older than jmm. If it's shane now, absolutely jmm next, that is if pbf still is "indisposed".
Excellent logic there, Corky. Pac beating Morales, Barrera, Marquez, Hatton, ODLH, Cotto, Clottey, Margarito, winning Fighter of the Year 3X, 4 lineals, and Fighter of the Decade = sham Berto having never fought a single elite opponent = the real deal? :rofl:rofl:rofl The doctor should have choked your ass out with the umbilical chord. :hi::hi::hi:
who in the name of all thats holy said berto is the "real deal"?? seriously what a shitty cop-out to an argument you've been losing the minute yu posted. you still haven't asked any of my questions, what has shane mosley done besides "name recognition? to deserve a fight with the best fighter in the sport?? so you're saying its okay for pac to handpick broken down opponents coming off losses with nothing but name recognition left in their legacy to go out on?? its okay for pac to fight old former champions at the worst moments in their careers? thats the only thing you're banking on and quite frankly it STILL hasn't worked.