Is everyone who said Morales was shot in 2nd Pac fight now going to condemn JMM??????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Jan 2, 2011.

  1. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    20,453
    Likes Received:
    7
    This fight is as bad as Pac-Clottey, Pac-Margarito, Pac-Mosley. Shame on Marquez for fighting bums like Pac.
     
  2. larrysmith

    larrysmith Guest

    pointless fight..morales is gonna get hurt
     
  3. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    13,939
    Likes Received:
    4
    :deal
     
  4. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    45,885
    Likes Received:
    3
    Morales vs Marquez is a TERRIBLE fight.
     
  5. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    34,250
    Likes Received:
    5,943
    This fight blows. I can't even pretend to be excited about it.
     
  6. Grillinnap

    Grillinnap Flomos are morons Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2009
    Messages:
    6,312
    Likes Received:
    0
    Morales wasn't shot in the 2nd fight. Don't let the idiots who say that he was shot even in his win against Pac fool you. They're just trying to make Pac look as bad as possible.

    The third fight, though, was unnecessary. EM was shot and weight-drained.
     
  7. Beatle

    Beatle Sheer Analysis Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    9,270
    Likes Received:
    269
    Erik Morales is shot beyond belief and will get absolutely KTFO by Marquez.

    Erik's weight has been fluctuating too much in the past year. This fight has brutal written all over it.
     
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    Look at the state of this tragic gimp.

    He spends years saying Morales was shot to hell in Pac 2 & 3, and now someone other than Pac is fighting Morales, El Terrible was only "past prime". Transparent, pathetic, biased, hate-filled fanboy ****.
     
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    I don't care. Why would I? I'm not Marquez's bank manager. I'm a boxing fan, so I want to see fair, competitive, meaningful fights. I couldn't give a **** what makes who more cash. That's their interest, not mine and not yours.
     
  10. horst

    horst Guest


    This is why I can't take this appalling slut seriously.



    This content is protected









    Yet another biased troll hater named and shamed. :smoke
     
  11. Casual133

    Casual133 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Messages:
    877
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pointless fight in my eyes. There is nothing to gain for JMM for this fight. I'd love to see Erik pull the upset though!
     
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    I've always preferred Marquez to Morales, but now I hope Morales smashes him. There is literally zero percent chance of that happening though. Marquez by stoppage for certain.
     
  13. Raskolnikov

    Raskolnikov Guest

    :lol: Ouch.
     
  14. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2007
    Messages:
    28,518
    Likes Received:
    86
    You know Morales had to strip naked to make weight in the FIRST fight & you could see his deterioration in all 3 fights (W12... LTKO10... LKO3... Pac never improved THAT much, it was more to do with Morales decline... Morales will beat both Pacquiao & Mayweathers ass once he beats the **** out of Marquez)
     
  15. horst

    horst Guest

    And what? :huh

    I've seen that happen a million times. Oscar De La Hoya had to do it for the Trinidad fight. That doesn't mean anything at all.

    So every time that a defeat is avenged with interest, the win is invalid because the result is a decline from the first fight? :huh

    This claim also holds no water at all. There have also been a million instances of this which had nothing to do with a fighter declining. It is eminently possible for the beaten fighter to come back with a new dedication, a new determination, a new gameplan and an improved physical state, and turn the tables.

    Both were important, but moreso Pacquiao's approach. Morales fought very similarly in the 1st fight and the 2nd, but in the 2nd Pacquiao was the heavier man (Morales was heavier in the 1st), and he fought more intelligently. If you can't see the difference in Pacquiao's approach for yourself, I don't know what to tell you. Pac was wild and wayward in the 1st, he was more measured and poised in the 2nd.

    :lol: And then David Diaz will outfox and outbox him for the p4p#1 spot.