Calzaghe vs. Hagler

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by joejab, Oct 21, 2008.

  1. COLD-HARD-TRUTH

    COLD-HARD-TRUTH Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    2,566
    Likes Received:
    8
    Hagler TKO, especially if it was a 15 rounder like they fought back in his day.
     
  2. DaHead242

    DaHead242 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    1,470
    Likes Received:
    0
    i think thats fair. Joe tends to win the second half of fights when his opponents tire, which wouldn't be the case against Marvin. I think it's fair to say that Hagler would win a close but clear decision. maybe 7-5 or 8-4. If he fought 10 times, Marvin would win 6 or 7. just my opinion though. Calzaghe has the stuff to beat Marvin if MArvin was not at his best.
     
  3. joejab

    joejab Thread Killa Full Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,076
    Likes Received:
    0
    Has Calzaghe ever been tired in a 12 round fight? I don't know if it is fair or not to say he couldn't handle 15 rounds.
     
  4. joejab

    joejab Thread Killa Full Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,076
    Likes Received:
    0
    Never thought of it that way, but you have got a point.
     
  5. Cultured Fist

    Cultured Fist Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    328
    Likes Received:
    0
    Depends when they fought for me Calzaghe was better 8 years ago but the size difference would also be significant. Calzaghe is what 6'0"-6'1" where as hagler was 5'9" and unlike Hearns he wasn't someone who got bigger with age but is naturally bigger.

    Then again Hagler was awesome I would have loved to have seen this fight.
     
  6. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,209
    Likes Received:
    292
    Yep, Hagler would not only have greater power, but he would have double the power of Joe! :D

    Just messing with you man. ;)
     
  7. joejab

    joejab Thread Killa Full Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,076
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's no biggie. I'm right now undecided about this. In the begining I picked Hagler by TKO, but now I'm not so sure.
     
  8. Cultured Fist

    Cultured Fist Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    328
    Likes Received:
    0
    you've mentioned power twice - also a young Calzaghe was not the light puncher we see today but actually was heavy handed. Lets not forget he knocked down Eubank who to quote Nigel Benn had a 'granite chin'.
     
  9. joejab

    joejab Thread Killa Full Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,076
    Likes Received:
    0
    Orginally it was a typo, but I think I'm going to let stay. Maybe Hagler has twice the power.:lol: On a serious note, even when Calzaghe was younger his power was good, but I believe it was never up to par with Hagler's.
     
  10. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,158
    Likes Received:
    2
    Regardless of JCs supposed iron chin I take Hagler by murder 1
     
  11. joejab

    joejab Thread Killa Full Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,076
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hagler was a monster, but could Calzaghe contain the monster? Lets ask Enzo.
     
  12. Rise Above

    Rise Above IBHOF elector Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2007
    Messages:
    8,038
    Likes Received:
    39
    I think Calzaghe is too quick and takes this by UD.
     
  13. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,158
    Likes Received:
    2
    Lets not bother :D
     
  14. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    14,565
    Likes Received:
    11
    I like Calzaghe by close but clear UD.
     
  15. joejab

    joejab Thread Killa Full Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,076
    Likes Received:
    0
    :lol: