Don't be ignorant

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bluebird, Jun 13, 2009.

  1. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    6,120
    Likes Received:
    2,890
    Cotto won the fight, even if you thought he didn't it would have been close and he fought with 1 ****ing eye! If he didn't have that problem he would have won comfortably.
     
  2. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2005
    Messages:
    32,089
    Likes Received:
    3,412
    I though he won pretty clearly 115-112, but I could easily see 114-113. I find it hard to argue that Clottey won, however.
     
  3. strongarm

    strongarm Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,681
    Likes Received:
    3
    I thought clottey clearly won the fight.
     
  4. heehoo

    heehoo TIMEXICAH! Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,763
    Likes Received:
    13
    Can't be ignorant when the facts clearly showed Clottey won that fight, though it was thisclose.

    He came back and proved his worth as a top notch fighter.
     
  5. swedeone

    swedeone Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,227
    Likes Received:
    3
    Sorry but anyone stating that Cotto won clearly is ludacris. This was a razor thin close fight, 114-113 someone. Period.
     
  6. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Messages:
    8,651
    Likes Received:
    4
    How?

    Lost the first rd 10-8, gave away the last four.

    Assuming he wont he rest, which he clearly didn't, he still couldn't have clearly won, could he?
     
  7. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Messages:
    8,651
    Likes Received:
    4
    Dude I don't know how Ludacris had this fight, in fact I didn't even know he followed boxing.

    Boxing is scored over 12 stanzas, one 10-9 goes in the books the same as another 10-9.