Hagler vs calzaghe

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by headhunter, Dec 1, 2007.

  1. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,328
    Likes Received:
    136
    You mean like the natural WW / L / Middle " name " on Hagler's resume, or how about the former 135lb " name " on there also?:roll::roll:

    Then again there is the 147 " name " that beat him too.:lol::lol:
     
  2. sid

    sid Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2013
    Messages:
    4,907
    Likes Received:
    3,029
    Top post:good
     
  3. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,848
    Likes Received:
    10,057
    Hearns easily defeated long time reigning king Virgil Hill, a fighter who I feel beats Calzaghe … Hearns had his weaknesses but I feel Cal was not a fighter to exploit them … Tommy was faster, Tommy had a longer reach, Tommy started fast and no doubt Tommy could hurt him badly … in addition, Cal was no puncher and that plays well for Hearns as well … I think Hearns would have had an excellent chance to bomb Joe out or decision him ..
     
  4. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    41,974
    Likes Received:
    4,032
    hearns is one of the few wws who stop calzaghe.
     
  5. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,328
    Likes Received:
    136
    I'd take your opinion far more seriously if you threw in Pacman and Mayweather also.:roll::roll:
     
  6. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    52,103
    Likes Received:
    23,328
    no hes about the only one, and would be lucky too as well. i think calzaghe knocks him out anyway.
     
  7. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,328
    Likes Received:
    136
    Tommy Hearns couldn't beat Calzaghe as long as his ass points downwards. Nothing like busy enough to handle the work rate of Calzaghe. No stamina, and physically weak.

    As stated Benn would do more damage to Hearns than he did the naturally, bigger, stronger, harder punching McClellan, but in a lot less time, and there is no way Nigel beats Calzaghe.

    Again forget those 2, Mike McCallum would have toyed with Tommy Hearns.
     
  8. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    41,974
    Likes Received:
    4,032

    I said WWs, meaning natural WWs, not blown up FWs/LWs.
     
  9. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,328
    Likes Received:
    136
    Then you should have said " former " WW, as he was still only 21 when he won the Welter title, and had gone up in weight in 2 years never to return.

    Not that it matters what he'd have weighed. Calzaghe stops him anyway.
     
  10. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    5,005
    Likes Received:
    15
    here's hearns and mccallum sparring. good stuff. any other welters you want to match calzaghe against? :)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WS0Boow5mzo
     
  11. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,328
    Likes Received:
    136
    And your point is???

    You might have made a better point if the still at the beginning of the vid, didn't give the appearance of Tommy looking ripped, and Mike looking to have a bit of excess around the midriff.

    Just saying.
     
  12. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    24,478
    Likes Received:
    129
    Hearns isn't knocking out Calzaghe. He always had power but his ability to finish off quality opponents drops off dramatically above 154..while he himself becomes more receptive to stamina and durability issues.
     
  13. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    23,792
    Likes Received:
    2,391

    I agree, Hearns had light heavyweight power as a welterweight but his chin,strength & stamina does not move up in weight...these are still all great fighters and capable but Tommys best was at welterweight-154
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,848
    Likes Received:
    10,057
    Calzaghe's chin :)30's)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r28gDW_SERs

    Hearn's crushing a very strong light heavyweight
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoxVdtIRVi4

    Calzaghe is a terrific style match up for Hearn's . Tommy had 5" in reach, speed and power … Cal had a suspect chin and no power … I like Hearns by KO.
     
  15. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    52,103
    Likes Received:
    23,328
    suspect chin never ko'd, listen hearns once slapped enough will evaporate, and hearns does not ko calzaghe fast. look at the leonard hearns 1 fight, he was knackered and the punches of leonard were more accumalative by that stage, alot like cals, but cal is the bigger bloke, leonard was also down many times, but recupirated, quite like cal does. u know hearns is a 154 fighter, calzaghe a 168 fighter, p4p hearns outranks cal. but doesnt beat him at joes natural weight :bbb