Qawi/Braxton - ATG?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by JohnThomas1, May 10, 2008.

  1. bumdujour

    bumdujour Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,990
    Likes Received:
    18
    borderline imo. had it not been for spinks (one of the three greatest light heavies imo) being there at the same time, he would have reigned for a long time.

    so talentwise, he certainly is the material. but his track record is just a little thin.
     
  2. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    5,112
    Likes Received:
    75
    Yes, he makes it. A very good and exciting offensive fighter.
     
  3. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    61,460
    Likes Received:
    42
    Thats pretty much it mate, you don't HAVE to prove it IMHO (sometimes a boxer is just unlucky in the era he fought) but to say that "if Duran wasn't around" or "Spinks wasn't around" isn't as good a justification when considering being an ATG as being able to say a fighter actually beat fighter x or fighter y.

    I can think up examples of why this point of view works and examples why it doesn't work (as I'm sure you can!) but its the way I generally look at things. Certainly in the Qawi example, less so with DeJesus admittedly.:good