115-113 cards are reasonable for Pac-Tim and i will tell you why

I also scored the fight 115-113 for Pacquiao.

I think the final scores are closer than the fight actually was(as if that makes any sense). I say that because Pacquiao had bagged the vast majority of the earlier rounds.

Problem with the judges cards who had Bradley winning is that even if they gave Bradley the final 3 rounds, they had to find 4 more rounds among the 1st 9 to give him. Which really is a stretch.

It seemed to many, and IMO rightfully so, that Pacquiao's lead was insurmountable.

 

round 2 is brads round and possibly 5
i had pac 115_113

 

Clearly...look at his face for ****s sake.

 

118-110, the first time around I watched it on BoxNation. I have Bradley winning 10 and 11. Argument can be made for 1 and 12, little guy.

 

:rofl okay, so getting destroyed by pacquiao and margocheato had no effect on him, and his monstrous wins over greats like yuri foreman, mayorga, and half blind margarashito made him a beast. whatever you floyd nuthuggers say

 

this fight wasnt even close. jmm-pac was close. mofos need to get their eyes checked

 

No in the past ****. im talking about in the floyd fight. He performed great and has nothing to do with the past.

And everyone who follows my threads and post knows im no floyd fan, let alone a *****. nice try tho

 

JMM 9-3 PAC

PAC 7-5 Bradley

Simple, easy to score fights both official results were wrong.

 

it wasn't a close fight if you stopped watching after round 8 (i gave only round 1 to Bradley)

if you watched all rounds including the last 4 it was a close fight as PAC was non existant in the last 4 and Bradley took all of them to make it a 115-113 fight.

 

right...and we know he is an actor so that's what buboy was telling him in the corner..."hey...don't forget to act tired!!! we have to sell this rematch!!! now go out there and lost the final four rounds!"

that makes sense.

 

Basically, 1, 10, 11 and 12 seem to be "consensus Bradley rounds within this community

3, 4, 5, 8 seem to be "consenused" Pacquaio rounds within this community.

2, 6, 7 and 9 are rounds that people see in different lights, regardless of who they viewed as the ultimate victor.

So you have a situation where based on how people have scored rounds, that each fighter seems to consistently take the four same rounds while 3 rounds remain up in the air (2, 6 and 9)

If you give 2, 6 and 9 to Bradley, you get 115-113. If you give them to Pacquaio, you get 112-116 against Bradley.

Those are the "Fair" scorecards on indication of how people judged each round.

 

No in the past ****, yet you compare him to his pre-Mosley self. Ever think that him looking so good against Floyd had more to do with floyd slipping than Cotto becoming a beast all the sudden:huh

 

No, i have followed cottos entire career of course im PR. and it has to do with not partying and drinking between fights, having a trainer that commands his respect and pushes him and teach him some new technique. he didn't even gassed like he always does

 

patsch

 

That's my biggest issue also, this fight being considered such a HUGE robbery. It was competitive, and debatable (clearly, as one can tell by all the threads) which doesn't make it a robbery. That word gets way overused by us fans. And Compubox, barring all it's limitations, still isn't am accurate way to judge or support an argument for a close fight, especially since it penalizes fighters for missed punches even when those missed punches control rounds (Bradley's jab, for instance). His jab wasn't landing frequently but he was firing it, marginalizing Pac's rushes in.