115-113? Serious question

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by osirus0830, Dec 17, 2011.


  1. Broxi

    Broxi Stand With Ukraine Full Member

    5,431
    312
    Oct 14, 2007
    I think that's fair. I would have it 10-2 but could even stretch to 9-3.

    Round 5 was a clear Froch round to me and I think he came on strong in the C Rounds, you could give him (IIRC) 10, 11 or 12 too.
     
  2. dannylatics

    dannylatics Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,059
    0
    Nov 21, 2008
    I gave Ward every round, maybe Froch won the 12th but I thought it was a clear landslide. 115-113 was shocking
     
  3. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    Froch won 1 or 2 rounds. Horrible scorecards.
     
  4. popejking

    popejking Adamek Full Member

    4,160
    1
    Mar 27, 2009
    115-113 is a ridicolous scoring. I would rather call it a shout out than such a close fight.

    118-110 was a right score
     
  5. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    5,791
    2,471
    Mar 24, 2005
    You cant give Froch a round because he didnt get smashed as badly as all the other rounds. He got thoroughly beaten. The judging might have been to make it seem closer for the benefit of future Froch bouts. At least the right man won unlike fights like jCC vs Sweet Pea.
     
  6. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,824
    2,970
    Dec 11, 2009
    I scored 4 rounds to Froch. It seemed a clear win but not a dominating win.
    I dont think either looked great
     
  7. aka TORA

    aka TORA Full Member

    1,935
    0
    Nov 23, 2010
    this is a problem once to often in boxing we gotta change this shite and corrupt judging system ward dominated at least 9 rounds
     
  8. popejking

    popejking Adamek Full Member

    4,160
    1
    Mar 27, 2009

    Froch fougt brave, but it was a fight to one goal.

    Dominating not, because many rounds were close. I would rather call it a schooling. Ward was better than Froch in every boxing aspect (handspeed, head and body movement, ring genealship, effective aggression, in and out fighting, combination punching, footwork, etc,).
     
  9. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    3, 5, 9, 11, and 12

    serious answer.

    I only gave him 4 of those 5 tho.
     
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    it was a close fight. Not a schooling or a domination. Just a good fighter losing to a better fighter.
     
  11. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    I gave him 3, 9 and 11. 117-111
     
  12. Schuden

    Schuden Guest

    This content is protected


    25% Clean Punching
    25% Effective Aggressiveness
    25% Ring Generalship
    25% Defense

    Clean Punching
    Landing on a scoring area (face or side of head, not including the back of the head; the front and sides of the torso) with the knuckle portion of the glove. Clean punches will land flush, not glancing or partially blocked by one's opponent. "Slapping" or "backhanding" is not allowed.

    Effective Aggressiveness
    Display of pressing forward, and in doing so, scoring more clean punches, or more damaging blows, than opponent. Particularly with hard punchers, even blows that are not landed very clean, but obviously affect the opponent, are given scoring weight.

    Ring Generalship
    The ability to control the pace and style of the fight.

    Defense
    The ability to avoid punishment.
     
  13. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,035
    1,074
    Aug 6, 2005
    Froch didn't dominate a single round, he was always beaten to the punch.

    I had it a shutout, and I had 1 round I thought you could give to Froch.. 1.

    People in the RBR were scoring rounds to Froch for not doing as bad as he had, and that is wrong.

    Froch thinks he lost big, and the fact that the official cards look so close will give people the impression that things didn't happen the way they did.

    Give it a year or 2 and people on ESB will talk about how Froch was robbed, look at the scores.
     
  14. Peterp

    Peterp Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,686
    336
    May 1, 2006
    you need to have NO judges from the same countries of the fighters because good judges are obviously trying so hard not to be bias at all that they are going the other way and giving any round in even slight doubt to the opposition of their countryman
     
  15. MrPeterson

    MrPeterson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,215
    0
    May 31, 2010
    To me, Froch did not win any rounds. I can understand giving him 2 rounds. Any more than that I don't think you know what you are watching