defend him??.... defend him for what..... winning in 4 rounds, by knockout.. why the hell would we have to "defend" wlad for knocking his opponet out Brittards make no sense:|
It's just **** like 'Wlad could do nothing but hold' that gets me. Step back, throw an uppercut, throw a hook. You're 7 inches taller and have 8 inches more reach than the guy, and he's not even throwing - you have no business clinching.
God, I forgot how stupid you are. Defend him from this holding criticism - the exact thing you, and others, are doing now. Please, use your brain . . .
one with no brain does not tell another person with a brain, to use your brain it makes no sense, kind of like you and the majority of british folk holding is part of boxing, clinching is part of boxing.... there is no magic number that defines "excessive" so its all hypothetical nonsense.....
I personally find Wlads octopus style hilarious, even more so since it makes him close to unbeatable in Germany. And Steward is probably thinking the same as you. Wlad has the tools to win in style, but he makes his life easy with his "hey, lets jab and grab the shorter guy to death"-approach.
Brittards logic: Wlad can't just knockout people, he has to do it in a certain brittard-approved style
it makes him unbeatable any where else on the planet wlad fought ibragimov in america... guess who won that fight.....? i wonder
:rofl :rofl :rofl God, Koman you really stepped your game up :scaredas:You are owning Brittards left and right :bbb