1926 Sam Langford v 2003 Mike Tyson

12 rounds current rules. How does this play out?

 

You disgrace Rocky & Brockton's name with this trolling garbage post . 1 after another. You think it's cute doing this crap don't you?
Pathetic.

 

Tyson of 2003 beats any "heavyweight" before 1940s with ease.

 

What is wrong with it? They were still active fighters. You guys have done the same prime v prime stuff for each fighter multiple times. Nothing wrong with variety

 

I would be reluctant to pick this version of Tyson over any world class opponent.

 

Not exactly!

 

Langford was just as gone as Tyson, but was blind and giving away 30/40lbs. Tyson should win this.

That said, who actually gives a ****?

 

Exactly.

 

He's a modern heavyweight with the benefit of steroids and coke I've been on both at once and once smoked a whole boxing club of all it's healthy fighters...

those boxfit women didn't know what hit them....