1988 Tyson vs 2010 Wlad Klitschko

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ForemanJab, Jul 5, 2014.


  1. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,003
    12,334
    May 8, 2014
    Gotta hand it to you wass1985 for fighting a valiant 1 man war against Mikey's fan club. You show that there is still someone with common sense on this forum. Wlad has basically proven he is one of the best of all time far surpassing the legacy of Tyson. He will soon pass the legacies of louis and Ali and the Americans in their pathetic jealousy and bitterness will always look to downgrade his abilities. Mike tyson doesn't deserve to spit shine Wlad's shoes let alone fight. Tyson had no heart and was a quiter he bit holyfield's ear because he knew he'd get knocked out again, quit against mcbride for no reason other than being a coward and refused to get off the floor against Williams.
    As soon as he tastes Wlad's power he'd be looking for a way out of the fight either quiting or fouling out. Wlad would be the first man to expose the Catskill Coward before the bum Douglas did the job.
     
  2. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Stop talking to yourself you stupid alt.

    funny how one of you goes offline as soon as the other one comes online?

    we can see your game, tosser :patsch
     
  3. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Everybody who disagrees with your nauseating fanboyism is an alter ego according to you!! :rofl
     
  4. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,003
    12,334
    May 8, 2014
    :lol:
    Hmm it's interesting an alt account accusation is coming from you when I've seen many posters who use strikingly similar amount of poor grammar, pretentious speech and laughably stupid arguments.

    I won't dissuade you from believing I'm using alt accounts. It does kind of make logical sense from your standpoint, wass1985 is owning you on this thread much in the same way I own you on every other thread. :rofl

    Anyways...Wlad pounds Tyson with the jab then then catches him with a right hand bomb! Fight's over. Wlad dominates and the Catskill coward and exposes him for the coddled American hype job he is. :deal
     
  5. heavy_handss

    heavy_handss Guest

    :lol: I SEE THAT THE OLD CLASSIC FORUM IS BACK
     
  6. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    Hang on now.

    I'm not American, neither is Azzer and I don't think Dino is either. I do think that there may be some inherent bias amongst SOME American boxing fans against Wlad, but you can't paint everyone with the same brush.
    Wlad has many American fans and many non-American critics. (I won't say hater since it's such a childish term.) I also find the race card often played by some Klitschko fans to be way off the mark, and pretty insulting.

    There is nothing Wlad could ever do to pass Louis or Ali in legacy, and to be honest, not Tyson either. Legacies are built on fights and moments in fights or even outside the ring that live long in the memory because they were exceptional to watch or experience.

    Sorry mate, but Wlad has not left us with a lot to talk about. He has no Rumble in the Jungle, no natural rival, no real talking points in any of his fights, he is not particularly charismatic and does nothing particularly memorable at all, either inside the squared circle or outside it.

    He does deserve all the credit in the world for being a long-standing and dominant champ, and he has always conducted himself with dignity and class.
    Fair do's.

    But he ain't a champ that has taken the masses to his bosom, or rather, the masses haven't taken him to theirs. He is not a sports megastar of renown in the same way as Tyson, Louis and Ali were.
    EVERYBODY, even non-fans of the sport, knew who these guys were. One simply cannot say the same for Wlad.
     
  7. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    foremansjab another Eastern European Slavic bum.

    Funny how he slates American "hypejobs" and then uses an American name.

    I smell a liar, fraud, hypocrite
     
  8. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012

    Come on then what is Tyson's rumble in the jungle??

    Every mega fight he had he lost, barring Spinks which was a mismatch!!

    So what if Wlad hasn't taken to the masses, the people who actually know about boxing know how skilled and complete he his as a fighter, the man would be a massive force in any era wether you want to believe it or not.
     
  9. JudgeDredd

    JudgeDredd Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,949
    33
    Sep 14, 2009
    That's the funniest thing I've read in ages! :lol:
     
  10. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,171
    25,408
    Jan 3, 2007
    He must be mesmerized by Wlad's early accumulation of WBO defenses.... Hence his claim that he will soon surpass the legacy of Joe Louis.
     
  11. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,003
    12,334
    May 8, 2014
    Now you are bringing race into it but I expected somebody like you to stoop to that level. I'm not eastern euro try again you racist C*cks*cker. I only dislike ignorant, bias fans who downgrade a guy because he has clearly surpassed one of their overrated favorites. That perfectly sums you up I'm sure you smell liar,fraud and hypocrite because you reek of it. :rofl

    Foreman was of course a great fighter and champion who beat a top 10 and top 25 ATG in their primes. Something Tyson never did in his amazingly short peak.
     
  12. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,003
    12,334
    May 8, 2014
    Say what you want Wlad has beaten the longest list of number 1 contenders of any hw champ in history. Soon to be the first hw ever to collect all the 4 major titles, 1st undisputed hw champ since Lewis and soon to break Joe Louis' records for title defences and longest reign.
     
  13. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    Tyson didn't have a Rumble in the Jungle. But what he brought to the table was an excitement and electric atmosphere to fights that hadn't been seen since Ali or even going so far back as Dempsey.
    He transcended the sport like Ali and maybe to a lesser extent Louis before him.
    I'm not going to bang on about his ability because it's plain to see.

    Boxing fans can see Wlad's ability for sure, but that doesn't make him any less dull to watch, does not take away from his flaws and it does nothing to the casual fan who may tune in once in a while (or at least would have in days gone by) to watch a good fight. He is not going to convert a non-fan into a fan of boxing.
    In short, unless you're a boxing fan, chances are he is obscure to Joe public and therefore irrelevant.

    Does that matter in the greater scheme of things? I think so. For instance, I knew next to nothing about basketball until I started watching Michael Jordan clips on youtube. Thanks to him, I have a greater interest and respect for the game in general.
    Ali and Tyson, for one, brought in massive interest from the casuals to the sport of boxing. They were a draw.

    To be honest, I don't think true greatness languishes in obscurity. But anyway...
     
  14. JudgeDredd

    JudgeDredd Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,949
    33
    Sep 14, 2009
    I think a lot of us were mesmerised by his early defences, but obviously not in the same way!
     
  15. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    Sorry, but no. Louis was the undisputed champion for the duration of his reign. Wlad has never been undisputed champion, and also not the best heavyweight for the entire duration of his reign either. (If you include the WBO strap, which he won when Lewis was still the real champion.)

    In all honesty, and this is not to disparage him but is at least a possibility, it can be argued that he was never the best in the division, courtesy of a certain other Klitschko hanging about at the same time, or at least for a good portion of that time.

    But we're going off-topic here...