well 24 days would of course be rejected because it is not even close to a reasonable cutoff the sad thing is you had reports of roach agreeing to 5 days, and pac even to 3 i think....then it all backslid
Judges generally are no nonsense people, but I'll wait to see the terms first. I still may not take sides after that.
And was all this testing about HGH anynow? Why is this suddenly the one drug being talked about? I really haven't followed this all that closely but I never go the impression this was just about HGH?
Yea that's some compromise < I want to be clear that statement is sarcassim. 24 from 30 is hardly a real compromise. Pacquiao clearly never wanted this fight.
Cause 24 isn't that different from 30...not much of a comprimise. Really if this is the beset manny can do he's dilusional.
well there has been no official statement made about this fight never happening, ever, in the future. Only that it wont happen come March. Why is that so hard for you to understand? atsch p.s. i've agreed with your stance on this entire matter, all i'm saying is there is no ruling out that this fight will never happen and if it ever does, i still give it to floyd via UD.....sheesh
i still think they are/were hung up on the cut off date pac basically still wanted scheduled blood (no a 24 day cut off is not random) tests and floyd wanted random
**** both of them and their camps. I don't think either side really wanted it that badly in MARCH. It seemed rushed and they'll probably looking to milk this and have more of a build-up. They couldn't delay it to April, May, or June because of Pacquiao's political campaign.
over at the scene they are reporting pacquiao plans to go ahead and face foreman....That means mayweather will fight a tune-up or wait for the mosley-berto winner in june-july....