In fairness Fury is awful as well and is maybe slightly better than someone like Micheal Grant. Adamek is bigger than Cunningham and has better chin and more durable. He also has higher output. Cunningham didnt fight his fight, he got into exchanges too much.
Haha Adamek speaks the truth and the brits are butthurt. A prime adamek would school fury from pillar to post and i wouldnt be so uncertain that he wouldnt be able to do so today. Adamek has his signature hw win against arreola. Now could you imagine fury surviving a single good punch from arreola?
I totally disagree with adamek, fury does have a future. all he needs to do is give american idol a shot...
So what? Adamek didnt act as if he was nailed by Foreman or Tyson! Adamek has a good chin and didnt get dropped. Cunningham almost never drops guys with 1 shot! Adamek is right. and no Adamek wasnt schooled by Chambers. BJ Flores said 1-2 point win. It was a close fight but yeah Adamek lost.
No he did no beat Chambers wide at all. That's a blatant lie and stop crying racism when someone criticize a fighter's performance. Try being a man. I'm white and Chambers -Adamek was close and Cunningham beat Adamek in the rematch.
Adamek went 10 with Vitali,beat Arreola,beat Grant,beat Travis walker who all have serious power. Adamek was smaller than Grant too and he beat him! Grant has way more power than Fury. Adamek very well could beat Tyson Fury.
Brits shouldn't blame Adamek's truthfulness. Tyson's uncle said Tyson was **** last night and gave Fury a 2/10 rating for the win.
Who cares about Adamek apart from about six Poles? Seriously. He's pointing out the obvious and looking like a jealous little girl in doing so. Must be desperate for attention or something.