Adamek vs Chambers

Where?

 

Tomasz is the same height (if not taller) than Arreola, and he had no problems tagging him all night. This isn't even a matter of tale of the tape. I can't see Chambers beating Adamek. Klitschko, that's another story.

 

The way Chambers boxes is all wrong for Adamek. Adamek does not have the power to knock out Chambers, and Adamek is open to counters, particularly against the straight-right, and Chambers has a very good counter straight-right. Also Adamek won't be tagging Chambers like he did against Arreola, and their speed is about the same.


I can't see Adamek beating Chambers by decision, the only way I see Adamek beating Chambers is by KO, and that is not going to happen.

 

Why do you have a picture of Ed picking up Wlad? It's embarrassing.

If Chambers couldn't beat Povetkin, how is he going to beat Adamek? I know you support your guy but you will see if/when the time comes that Adamek would be favored.

This reminds me of all the yahoos saying the same crap about Arreola. Yes, Arreola is top material, but he can't dance with Tomasz, and neither could Eddie.

 

How many Adamek's fight have you seen ?

The big tool of Adamek is that he's always preparing an exceptional game-plan (A,B) for each next rival and he's able to perform it well. Example compare fights each other: Arreola, Cunningham, Banks. In every time he fights differently. I have seen 4 fights of Eddie and he always fights the same fight. I have no doubt. Adamek would find the way to beat Eddie.

 

Adamek on points, possibly a KO. Adamek has every technical skill that Chambers possesses, plus he has the power to hurt him. Also, Adamek just seems to be tougher.

 

Chambers is a different fighter compared to when he fought Povetkin TWO YEARS AGO.

 

They both box differently. Adamek has the better foot movement and a better work-rate, Chambers is more slick, but very skilled. If Adamek had a hard time against Cunningham, he will have a hard time against Chambers, who hits harder and has a much smoother offense.


And lol at Adamek knocking out Chambers, Adamek is not a power puncher.

 

Chambers on points

 

None of those boxers are A-Level except Cunningham, and he almost lost that fight.

 

Adamek

 

And he almost lost to Paul Briggs twice and almost lost to Jason Estrada and got almost KOed by Chris Arreola. Almost

Adamek is kind of fighter who doesnt dominate his opponents. He usually fights close fights and wins fairly. If he fight Chambers, I see it as a MD or SD for Adamek. Of course that Eddie has a chance to outpoints Adamek, but Chambers would be the underdog in such a fight. To be clear, Chambers isnt Chad Dawson and Adamek isnt drained anymore.

 

he didnt almost lose to jason estrada nor did arreola almost ko him. Arreola fight was kind of domination in terms of rounds won, Arreola should only win 2 rounds: 6th and eleventh

 

Im not sure who i would pick in this fight if it did materialize?. i think i would pull towards it being very close before Adamek takes the last couple of rounds due to his good conditioning. I think the final decision would be very debatable and could likely depend on where the fight takes place.

I would take Adamek by SD

 

Against Povetkin he threw the fight he was winning. He won the first half and then stopped fighting from that on :huh. Was he gassing, or was he pulling off a Golota (To Golota (verb) = quiting even though winning)?