Linares and Lomachenko were not top lightweights? On what planet are you on? Besides that, it is hard to take you seriously at all when it is clear you are completely bias here. "sLowmo"? The ****?
well, when you are right, you are right. My point is hard to defend. It sounds stupid. Plus, I'm a huge linares fan. Anyway, I still think that campbell is not a top fighter.
I am not arguing that Campbell is a top fighter. (I think he is, but that is besides the point) You said that Lomachenko and Linares were not top Lightweights, and that cracked me up. You also said that Campbell was picking on a featherweight in Ryan, despite Ryan being at Lightweight for 2 years now. And you said that any top fighter would beat Campbell up, despite that fact that Linares won by a single point and Loma had a though fight with him.
yes, it sounds stupid even when I read it. I say stupid things sometimes.. I was trying to defend a point that cannot be defended actually.
mee too. It will bring some light to a lot of doubts that I have. Regarding ryan, and regarding campbell too.100% sure I wont miss this one.
I think he is pretty good , like from 5 th till 10 th in division, from someone might be like just in top 15. division is with high number of boxers, therefore this is not C level at all and not B- level or just B level. Not a champ but bot bad at all, he is good. There is this covid crisis stuff and also fight delay. this too will work vs Campbell and looks will gave Garcie more chances too.
I have never got on board with Campbell n I don't know why... Only reason I think I dislike him is Adam Smith comparing him to ****in de la Hoya in his first fight n that's not his fault... closer the fight gets more I feel Garcia catches him cold
Once upon a time, Chinares with several face plants on his belt and a two piece combination face down as s up to DeMarco & Thompson. Same DeMarco that got schooled by who most people call a bum in Broner. Chinares then decided to scour the world for a beatable belt holder, that was also surrounded by contenders he could beat without having to once again kiss the canvas. He found his targets and flew on over to Manchester. Kevin Mitchell, not much to say about him. One Dollar Crolla who bent over like a cheap hooker over the course of 2 fights. Lastly, Chinares set his sight on Campbell's Chunky Soup which was wrapped in gold. He never once beat the top dogs of his division, nor did he avenge any of his losses. Had he done so, his career would have been over. He chose the right path for his career. That simple.
I dont like linares because he's unbeateable or the best ever. I like linares because I like his boxing skills (even if they are not perfect, or there are better p4p fighters than him). He's a top notch fighter however, extremelly good. If some says that broner is a bum... honestly, he should watch curling instead of boxing. Another story is his brain. I mean, his NO brain. But broner (3 divisions champion) have (had) talent enough to be whatever he would have wanted to be in this sport. Unfortunately he chose to be no-one (in boxing history, I mean)... bad for him.
Broner is a bum. Was hyped up garbage. Lost to Quintero and Ponce De Leon Beat up on midgets as a weight bully Old man Paulie almost won a decision then Maidana made him his son. His best win/performance is still Demarco.
I like to think he had talent. That he was not a bum, but an idiot. I admit you are wielding powerfull arguments, though.