Dude, Ive already handed your arse to you once tonight in the Calzaghe thread and now your ragging on another Brit so you can get some self worth back. Hamed was top class but had an ego, ditched Ingle who cut the sloppyness from his game and kept him tight. Once he went Hamed fell faster than **** down a urinal. Quit with the pussyhole internet warrior stuff mate.
Im Scottish, you idiot. Not british. Also you blatently disregard any facts that are presented and say that an undisputed Champion is a hype job after he losed 8-4 to an ATG. Idiot.
Nice example of balanced thinking. If he was Welsh, the Sheep ****ing thing may have flown. For Scots follow the Alcoholic vain of insults, or battered mars bar jibes (No offence 196).
lmao at this thread naseem was a great fighter full stop,his talent was undeniable and as a boxing fan i feel robbed of seeing a true great ply his trade.
It wasnt a Mexican:nono It was ALLAH:rofl He'd tired of Hamed's double talking praise and pathetically long ass ring entrances:good **** Hamed, he's an over rated, full of ****, and egotistical midget:good Serves his ass right:yep
How can a guy that would have been the first man to hold all 4 major belts at featherweight had Vasquez not been wrongly stripped and a 2 weight world champion be exposed simply as a hypejob? Say what you want about his loss to Barrera, but his achievements prior speak for themself Your stupidity never ceases to amaze me
My debate was pretty rational, I gave the reasons why it is plainly wrong to label Hamed as a an "exposed hypejob" Great or not by your definition, his achievements are outstanding and with your history of throwing mud at European fighters and to simply label him as a hypejob I don't know what you expect
typical american, i ask for a yes or no answer and i get a whole essay. anyways i'll just take that as a no.