Well I didn't notice a January date. It doesn't matter anyway, Laz was still upfront with it and made it known to everyone that it was him. That 'honesty' that you're all demanding now, is what had him banned last time round. But who cares. He done the crime and served the time, and is now back to his legit 'Lazarus' account, one that he'll have the comfort of using forever. Unlike you, Jerome, who has the burden of that bet hanging over his head.
The sad thing is was that Lazarus used to accuse me of being other people on here day in day out. He still does actually, even accuses me of being some boxingnews24 writers. He still just cannot comprehend there is more than one person who can see that Khan is a total hypejob fraud.
I wouldn't care if Lazarus had told the truth when he was confronted over and over but he continually lied so he can stay on the forum and post about Khan. He has 0 credibility and could be permanently banned and I wouldn't stick up for him for 1 second.
How did he serve the time? That's the whole point. He didn't. If he had stayed away during his ban and then come back, the bet would still be on.
Lazarus is like a crooked cop trying to arrest someone for not paying their mortgage. He can **** off. This forum doesn't need these lying pieces of ****.
Bull****, Jerome. There was nothing in the bet about alternative accounts. It was simple..... Khan signs - Jerome leaves for good Khan doesn't sign - Lazarus leaves for good Laz creating an alternative, had NOTHING to do with this bet. It was done because his original account was snitched on, and any attempts to own up to the alt, would again lead to another suspension/ban. The bet is not void. It still stands. It still requires BOTH guys to honour it. If Khan pulls out of the December 11th bout, I'd be the first in line to tell Laz to pack his bags.
Rico, Laz coming back on two different accounts after being banned has EVERYTHING to do with our bet. Our bet was a ban bet. He clearly showed he would never honor a ban bet by doing that. I don't know how you cannot see this. The bet is void.
The **** are you talking about? If you bet with a bookie who cooked the books and then got his license revoked, came back and said "okay, I get to keep your money though" you'd say **** off too.
I really dunno what he is on about. "His account served time". So I guess if my account got banned for a year and I came back on various different alts, it would be okay because "my account served time.":rofl
Jerome, you yourself are on your 5th (or whatever) account. But it didn't stop you from commiting yourself to the bet, did it? And him creating an alt, had nothing to do with a permanent ban - because he wasn't permanently banned. It was merely a response to a suspension. A suspension which was always going run out; thus allowing him to return. The alt was simply to bide the time. Something which you've done on numerous occasions.
Rico the bottom line is Lazarus showed he wouldn't stick to a ban. He would simply make other accounts and come back. End of discussion. The bet is void.