Amir Khan would dismantle Hatton.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Shane, May 17, 2009.


  1. Mr. Blobby

    Mr. Blobby Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,136
    0
    Feb 28, 2009
    him beating hatton would make even more ppl hate him. think beating kotelnik would lead to bigger fights compared to just beating hatton.
     
  2. REatb6869

    REatb6869 Active Member Full Member

    847
    0
    May 19, 2008
    Kotelnik will probably beat Khan anyway.

    Khan-Hatton depends on how much Ricky has left. I tend to think even a declininnig Hatton would have an easy time with Khan.
     
  3. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    bigger fights, eh? -a win over ricky would catapult amir into the mainstream public which leads to way bigger fights than kotelnik would.. i mean, some people dont even know who the **** kotelnik is.
     
  4. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    i got ricky over khan as well but i highly doubt it'll be easy.
     
  5. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    I agree khan would win.
     
  6. Mr. Blobby

    Mr. Blobby Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,136
    0
    Feb 28, 2009
    yr wrong, kotelnik maybe **** but atleast he has a title. hatton aint got ****.

    Incase u didnt know Kotelnik picked Khan and not the other way around. Kotelnik picked Khan because he is the easiest and the most profitable guy to fight. His other choice was Victor Ortiz. Kotelnik has fought two mandatories and has a voluntary defense available so he chose Khan for the reasons outlined above.
     
  7. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    so your saying that a win over kotelnik would be better for khans career than a win over hatton :patsch
     
  8. Mr. Blobby

    Mr. Blobby Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,136
    0
    Feb 28, 2009
    exactly.
     
  9. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    :patsch
     
  10. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    Is this a joke? Just cuz pac easily destroyed hatton does mean not any fighters can beat him now:patsch. Khan has speed but can he hurt hatton? Remember what barrera said? He said he doesn't punch hard and this was a super featherweight going up in weight. Hatton is much bigger than barrera.
     
  11. Mr. Blobby

    Mr. Blobby Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,136
    0
    Feb 28, 2009
    he's stil a midget with short arms.
     
  12. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Hatton was able to get Pac on the ropes in the early seconds of the fight. He would bulldoze Khan.
     
  13. 10shinhan

    10shinhan Member Full Member

    432
    0
    Sep 6, 2008
    That jokes not funny. :roll::roll::roll:

    Chinny Con 'Khan'ie
     
  14. djm

    djm Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,208
    2
    Dec 17, 2006
    I doubt the Warren/Hatton relationship would ever allow this to happen.

    How long until Witter is calling Khan out? Imagine having 2 golden goose countrymen during your career and missing both? That'd suck.
     
  15. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Don't get lost on the Hatton loss against Pac . . . Hatton would still beat Khan. Pacquiao made it look so easy because he tagged Hatton very early . . . but Khan? I doubt it.