amir should not get a rematch

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by gattiwarrior, Dec 11, 2011.


  1. roe

    roe Guest

    Amir Khan has always been too good for the British title ;)
     
  2. slipnduck

    slipnduck Member Full Member

    285
    0
    May 22, 2008
    Not butted there.
    If a guy is pressuring forward with his head lowered (not lunging) and you lean back on the ropes it'll happen - get down and go to town with him then it wont.
    If you can't do that, well I guess you could hold him down and push him away and hope you don't get penalised for those fouls.
     
  3. rampant

    rampant Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,631
    9
    Feb 24, 2011
    Right, in an ideal world everything would work out! and every fight was perfect and you did the right thing 100% of the time.
     
  4. pichuchu

    pichuchu Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,751
    3
    Mar 13, 2011
    why should he get a rematch?
    he lost against a mandatory challenger he goes to the back of the line.
    Peterson vs bradley imo should be the fight made. Peterson whould avenge his only lost and try and unify the division. Then rematch khan (even if he loses to bradley or wins)
     
  5. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    why not?


    i cant believe so called boxing fans dont want to see a rematch of a great fight.

    should berto vs ortiz be cancelled too?
     
  6. izmat

    izmat Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,611
    0
    Sep 19, 2008
    Peterson doesn't need to but he should keep to his word IMO
     
  7. RNS

    RNS Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,239
    0
    Jun 11, 2011
  8. roe

    roe Guest

    That's cuz Golden Boy are stupid and still acting like they hold the cards. They don't. "Talk to the champ."

    As mentioned before, Lamont Peterson will simply go to the highest paying opponent next. It may well turn out that it's Amir Khan anyway but there's certainly no guarantee. They might be best off avoiding Khan for the short term.
     
  9. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,276
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    Because they weren't particularly contraversial fights. Khan/Peterson was. Are you telling me you wouldn't to see a rematch? It was one of the fights of the year!:huh
     
  10. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    :huh What?
     
  11. Bill C84

    Bill C84 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,219
    1
    Sep 11, 2011
    I believe Boom00 is ESB's old friend Boxen, If not he has the same mental capacity at least.
     
  12. pichuchu

    pichuchu Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,751
    3
    Mar 13, 2011
    Because Khan doesnt deserve it, plain and simple. And theres better fights that can be made then khan vs peterson 2, the fight wasn't that action packed.
     
  13. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    Khan, the former unified champion, lost a razor-thin decision and he doesn't deserve a rematch?

    I think we can see your agenda pretty clearly.

    I think Peterson deserves an easy money fight (and a rest after a tough schedule), but Khan deserves a rematch right after.
     
  14. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    37
    Jan 7, 2005
    :lol: ****ing hell!! Have a lie down fella!!:lol:
     
  15. pichuchu

    pichuchu Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,751
    3
    Mar 13, 2011
    Umm so in your mind all champions that don't lose decisivly deserve a straight rematch?
    ask your self these questions:
    Did khan win? NO
    Did the referee unjustly take points of Khan? NO
    Why does he deserve a rematch??