Definitely, and at a neutral locale he likely pulls it out too. I don't like Dirrell at all, before the Abraham fight I wanted Abraham to knock his head off, now he's even worse with all the **** he's pulled since, but he beat Froch.
anyone who score more than 3 or 4 rounds for Froch doesn't know how to score a fight.. I'm not a Dirrell fan, really but, Froch should have two losses on his record.
Two scoring judges thought different . Just because u say Dirrell won in a forum over and over doesn't actually mean thats what happened. He lost, tough ****.
I don't think he did but this could go on all night. Lets return to the original topic. What does he have to do make a comeback?
There has never been a poorer performance than Dirrell's, without injury, DQ etc., which earned the contender a world title. He didn't deserve the nod against Froch.
well if he can still take a punch after that foul, all he has to do is use his natural talent...he claims we are going to see "a new Dirrell".. whatever that means...
:rofl its a good thing u guys had Joe C. and Hatton, b/c Froch SUCKS. You shouyld go root for Khan or someone actually GOOD.
He's still good enough to fight the top level of SMW, really he just needs to get back in the ring and beat someone. Yes, not **** he lost on the cards and in the record books you mongoloid, the point is that it's not exactly a clear victory and there's something of an asterisk next to Froch's win.
a negative performance against Froch ?? Dirrell outboxed/Out classed the guy Froch is the one that had the negative peformance with the constant punches behind the head and slamming Dirrell on the canvas. How come no one ever says anything about that ?
Give me a worse title winning performance than Dirrell's? I'm not talking about simply being in a bad fight either, I'm talking about that level of cowardice. Just one fight.