Andre "The Matrix" Dirrell vs. "Bad" Chad Dawson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RealIzm, Aug 14, 2010.


  1. roversbowers

    roversbowers Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,960
    0
    Jun 10, 2009
    Chad dawson, rather easily i believe. Im not buying this Andre Dirrell frenzy, i think he is an awkward but very limited fighter. Ward will beat dirrell and so will kessler for that matter.
     
  2. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    I give Dirrell all the credit in the world for beating Abraham, but Abraham and Dawson are night and day.

    Abraham was the smaller man, and Dirrell could still control the fight by outboxing him.

    Against Dawson, he won't be afforded that luxury. He will have to work his way inside. Dawson is not only the bigger man but he is almost as fast and just as if not better skilled.

    And even though Dirrell put up a big performance he was still knocked unconscious by an illegal punch, so he may be hesitant to get back in there and fight.
     
  3. zorryt

    zorryt Active Member Full Member

    762
    0
    Mar 21, 2009
    Who will run faster? Dirrell is most coward and a runner just like floyd his idol.
    Dawson is a semi coward only because he does not run too much like his idol floy the *****.
     
  4. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    ****ing kids on here..:-(
     
  5. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    From a style point I don't see how anyone can say who will win. Both of these fighters can fight very negitive if they choose to. No one can predict how they will fight. They both have the tools to beat each other.

    Also I need to see how that concussion from AA effects Dirrell.
    And find out WTF happend to the Dawson of last year.
     
  6. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    They can both fight negative, but I think if Dirrell chose to fight that way, given Dawson's size advantage, he would be playin his game, and lose the fight.
     
  7. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    Why? Pascal fought negitive and Dawson did not know how to pressure him. Pascal is smaller then Dirrell.
     
  8. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    On a side note. Floyd mayweather SR said Dirrell was touching Chad too much in sparring.
     
  9. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    But Pascal fought negative in order to explode and put on pressure, and then fight hard on the inside.

    Dirrell fights negative to not get hit.
     
  10. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009
  11. GoldenArms

    GoldenArms Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,326
    242
    Jan 24, 2009
    Dirrell would whoop that ass, just like he whooped that ass in the gym a little while back.
     
  12. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    Now this was sparring that happened several years ago and Bad Chad was getting "touched" too much??

    Dirrell whips Dawsons ass lefty, righty, attacking, or defensive.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,515
    21,901
    Sep 15, 2009
    Andre Direll has **** loads of natural talent in my books, he has pretty much a complete arsenal, and providing he turns up with the right game plan he should beat dawson.

    im mean he fought like **** vs froch, and some still think he did enough to win, speaks volumes about how good he is .
     
  14. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    Funny how Dirrell also has 1 loss yet isn't disregarded:huh:rofl
     
  15. Prince

    Prince Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,626
    0
    May 9, 2010
    I don't get what the ****ing big deal is over Dirrell