Another British Bum Exposed

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Uncle Oden, Jul 16, 2011.


  1. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    the burns vs cook fight wasn't a disgrace in the sense that it was a **** poor fight for one of them, or both. cook had a serious injury. that's just the way the cooky (pardon the pun) crumbles.

    the **** that's been coming out of america for the last ten years - now that's a disgrace. their not even worthy of the bum label. it was a great fight to watch. something you guys don't have much of. just leave it to the puerto ricans, the europeans and the mexicans - there's a good boy. :good
     
  2. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Exposed how?

    Murray showed tonight exactly what we all knew about him. People only had him a favorite going in because most weren't convinced that Mitchell would be at his best. Not because he [Murray] was better.

    The only thing tonight exposed was the false belief that Mitchell is a distracted and damaged fighter from the Katsidis loss.
     
  3. Uncle Oden

    Uncle Oden Respect Guzman banned

    6,753
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    your original post? Yea, i did that awhile ago.
     
  4. Uncle Oden

    Uncle Oden Respect Guzman banned

    6,753
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    Cook was damaged goods. Getting smacked in the back would not have ended a fight for a healthy fighter. There is no way he didn't feel that throughout camp. That was stealing money from the public.

    There are as many good American fights as British, but in your country these meaningless fights are still a big deal. They still get coverage. That's not a bad thing from a fan's perspective, but I'm saying there are plenty of exciting, untelevised fights between American fighters held here.
     
  5. FistsOfFury

    FistsOfFury Active Member Full Member

    1,498
    0
    Jul 10, 2010
    I missed that :lol: PS English spelling bro. No Z.

    And basically you agree with my point then. He wasn't exposed because people saw him for what he is.
     
  6. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    Exposed?, as what a euro level fighter? which, he is
     
  7. Blake Rayne

    Blake Rayne Fat Cuban Aficianado Full Member

    5,373
    11
    Mar 26, 2011
    As an Australian I'm all for giving it to the poms. But they just keep producing quality boxers.

    Wankers
     
  8. Nonpareil Jack

    Nonpareil Jack Member Full Member

    118
    0
    Jul 4, 2011
    Great fight. Needs a re-match. Mitchell looked good and much cleaner work. I was up for Murray but hats off to Mitchell
     
  9. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    i agree, cook shouldn't have been in the ring. he wasn't healthy. that's why he retired a couple of years ago - because of the bad back. the doctor told him it's never going to get better. if he can put up with the pain, then box if you want to. he tried to, but it wasn't happening. that's the last we'll see of cook.

    the reason they are a big deal over here is that we're passionate about boxing. we come out to support our fighters. wouldn't you like it to be that way in the states?

    and to call them "meaningless fights" is just ignorant... mitchell vs murray was one of the most anticipated fights in a long time. both lightweight contenders.

    bellew vs mckenzie was a rematch.. the first fight was so good, they had to do it again. bellew is an undefeated british and commonwealth champ. he's also a prospect. hardly meaningless.

    and the burns vs cook fight was a world championship fight. had cook of been fit, it would of been a good fight... but he wasn't. it happens like that sometimes.
     
  10. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    top man. :good
     
  11. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    no need for a re-match.. the same thing happens again. murray will be back though.
     
  12. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    True enough. What about Frankie Gavin who earned a split decision against midfielder Curtis Woodhouse?
     
  13. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    i've never been big on frankie. don't think he's going anywhere. he's boring as hell as well.
     
  14. Ant68

    Ant68 Active Member Full Member

    1,030
    1
    Dec 28, 2010
    I knew Mitchell would win clearly if he had his head screwed on. My only two problems were:

    - He was coming off a loss
    - He was relatively new at the weight

    But fair play to him, what a fight and result. :rasta
     
  15. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    didn't see the fight can't judge, Curtis is a underrated fighter though, but he should win a clear decision against him. Gavin squares up when he attacks and footwork needs to be better