Not doubting Pac because Pac doesn't seem the type to intentionally use anything illegal. Others are probably on anything Pac MAY be on. Getting people to doubt Pac was Mayweathers intention & I'm not falling 4 it. "I would take the test if I had nothing 2 hide so Pac should" is an ignorant arguement IMO
what is the critical number that determines what constitutes history. is it 2, 3 or more? considering that not making weight is a breach of contract (ask castillo), one time is a history. if you are giving your opinion on how many incidents equal a history then i will just disregard your comment and move on.
Castillo was different. He weighed higher than the division limit, that is why the belt was taken off of the line. Mayweather still came in at the WW limit, just above the catchweight. He still should have came in where he said he would, but it's not accurate to compare this occurence to Castillo.
atsch That's why Schaefer the anti-doping advocate has to file for a request to prove that random blood tests are necessary.
youre right. what floyd did was way more chicken**** than what castillo did. to agree to a weight you never really intended on making and then 2 days before the scrap you tell your oponent that he can take 600k or lose the fight he has been training for half a year.
To your point FMJ also killed Manny in PPV buys for common opponents. So had Mayweather insisted on a 60/40 split would you be saying "negotiations are negotiations"? I don't think so. Everyone would have said FMJ didn't want to fight.