Archie Moore vs Bernard Hopkins

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by vipers, Oct 28, 2011.

  1. vipers

    vipers Guest

    12 rounds
    light heavyweight
    Who wins and why?
     
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    28,075
    Likes Received:
    57
    Hopkins lost to Jack Chase you wild man
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    279
    So did Moore :lol:
     
  4. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,241
    Likes Received:
    158
    Hopkins's track record at LHW:

    Decision win over Tarver
    Close decision win over Winky Wright (a 154 lber in his prime) fought at a catchweight
    Split decision loss to Calzaghe
    Decision win over Pavlik (a 160 lber) fought at a catchweight
    Decision win over Andrade's inferior brother
    Decision win over a shot Roy Jones
    A hometown draw against Jean Pascal
    A decision win over Jean Pascal
    Injury loss to Dawson

    Basically his meaningful wins at 175 are over Tarver and Pascal.

    I don't think that's enough to put him in discussions with Archie Moore at 175 lbs.
     
  5. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    28,075
    Likes Received:
    57
    that doesn't count though, you should know this, Moore is excused
     
  6. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    28,075
    Likes Received:
    57
    it's not about who should be in discussions with who, nobody's asking you to rate Hopkins' legacy at 175 pounds, you're being asked who would win a fight between Hopkins and Moore.

    If you're saying that you question Hopkins' ability to hang with Moore because you believe he is unproven at the poundage then ok, but you have to understand a question mark over his ability at the weight doesn't necessarily mean he can't hang with him, it's a question mark, assuming he can't deal with Moore is similar to assuming he can. I'll take Moore because of his strength at the weight and because at his best he made fighters fight.
     
  7. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    279
    Good point :lol:
     
  8. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,241
    Likes Received:
    158
    I think his legacy at the weight shows that he was never at the level required to take on an Archie Moore in an even match-up. We have to consider that he was over 40 years old and not fighting at his best weight when competing as a light heavy.
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    28,075
    Likes Received:
    57
    yeah like I say, all things considered, I have Moore. For the record I thought he beat Calzaghe and therefore never lost at the weight in my opinion, **** fight though.
     
  10. darling dame

    darling dame Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,070
    Likes Received:
    3
    I think Archie would KO bemard
     
  11. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2005
    Messages:
    5,262
    Likes Received:
    2,478
    I like Moore against any version of Hopkins...