Arreola stinks, as does Walker...

Your spelling stinks.

 

This thread suck's ASS.

MR.JM22

 

Fight was good,get over it.

 

:nod

:nod

 

chill bill. holy's an atg, but larry donald is nowhere close to arreola. timing, improvisation, and determination win fights. who cares if chris is slow as ****? so is margo, clottey, andrade, angulo, etc. alot of folks had walker as the best american heavy and the one to expose arreola, but chris did his homework. he's a brawler and you should know most brawlers don't rely on speed, but timing and pressure. the guy has over 200 amateur fights. he's got experience, it's the discipline on his weight that has people worried. other than vitali, i think walker gives anyone a damn good fight if not upset them

 

he would easily beat peter and ruiz[/quote]


Your wrong about him beating Peter,,, Peter has the better chin and better power

 

I"m from virginia,,,, the east coast is where it's at **** the left side

Mr.FourtyOunce

 

Walker has power and potential (diamond in the rough potential, but it's there), but NO brains...and a shaky chin.

Arreola is a milder version on all fronts. He has okay power, but not like Walker's. Not much potential to speak of, enough to beat clubfighters and very flawed opponents. He's not dumb as a bag of **** like Walker, but he's not dripping with ring intelligence either. His chin isn't as bad as Walker's, but it's not great and won't hold up at the elite level.

If either ever obtains a piece of the world heavyweight title pie, it will be a telling low water mark and black eye for the division and the sport.

 

Whatever. There have been quite a few worse heavyweight beltholders than Arreola, including two in the past couple years (Briggs and Maskaev, and I'm not sure Ibragamov is significantly better either). Tell me with a straight face that Arreola is worse than Michael Bentt.