Obviously it meant something in the older days but sanctioning bodies are pathetic nowadays. When was the turning point? And why?
90's I think, it still meant something during haglers reign but it is nothing now, so somehwere in the 90's they messed up.
When sanctioning bodies stopped caring about the sport and just wanting money. They have so many ****ing belts now that it is pathetic. Some sanctioning bodies even make it hard for their champion to unify the titles.
I'd say the 90s is when it really started to get bad, and then the 00s it reached a new level. Boxing had two major titles from the 1920s to the 1980s, but usually there was just one guy with the two titles anyway (especially during the first half of the century). Then the IBF and WBO arrived in the 80s, and it has just gotten ridiculous. Super champ, diamond belt, regular champ, WTF?
If im not mistaken i imagine it was the WBA and WBC. Kind of made unification bouts mean something as well. EDIT: Of course it was you said so how come i didnt see that.
When the WBC issued their 154 championship to a 150 bout with two nobodies in the 154 weight division
After the Walker Law in the 1920s, it was the NBA and NYSAC. In the 1960s, the NBA became the WBA and NYSAC supported the WBC. Either one or two champs in a division sounds really nice right now.
Ever since 1995 when Robbie Regan fought Ferid Ben Jeddou for the IBF interim Flyweight title, slowly they've become more and more meaningless since then.
you don't even watch boxing that's why you're a fan of no fighter you're so useless you couldn't even make snow melt