the IBF watered the idea of belts down but the correct answer is the creation of the WBO . . . after that every tome dick and harry thought they could create a sanctioning body. The Ring belt is a step in the right direction though
Sadly nowadays i consider the WBO more legit than the WBA or WBC who are just joke organisations right now (yes i know they are all bad)
The WBO opened the floodgates for the Alphabetti-Spaghetti sanctioning bodies, although actually now they're not the worst of the four main ones (that's the WBA) but they are indirectly responsible for the creation of the WBF, WBU, UBO, GBU, etc, etc.
30 years ago when these sanctioning bodies came into being.titles nowadays dont mean anything unless its undisputed or lineal
In the late 80s, early 90s. When I was a kid, everybody knew who the champions were: Hagler, Holmes, Spinks, Duran. By the time I was in college (mid 90s) there were multiple champs in nearly every division.