To me nothing is funnier than world class boxers fighting in world title fights testing positive for weed
Ironically enough about the weed stamps, I remember hearing that the catch 22 was that you needed to already have some in order to be approved, at which point they would arrest you for possession. Don't know how much validity there is to it and I didn't research it to verify, but it wouldn't surprise me if that were the case.
if you know what a peer reviewed journal is you also know they're an unreliable source, **** for brains. if i was a loser like you with infinite amount of time to troll the internet I'd be able to find you some peer reviewed journals contradicting eveyrhting you posted. look out everyone we got a net PHD up in this *****. you can find proof for anything online you ****ing dumb ass. again, no one has ever died directly from weed, it's a fact.
he wasnt citing a peer reviewed study. he linked to a newspaper story in britain whereas a man died but they didnt know why, but he smoked weed....so the weed MUSTA killed him. and you are right. studies can have their results and methodology so twisted that the study will prove whatever they want it to prove. take the ****** study with weed, or the boron study which proved boron raised testosterone levels 300% or something crazy. the study was done on boron deficient post menopausal women. but boron sold like mad to bodybuilders. which is why i want to see a study showing weed kills, with the methodology and results. there simply isnt one