Barney Ross is a top ten all-time great

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Manassa, Nov 25, 2009.

  1. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Messages:
    7,766
    Likes Received:
    94
    This content is protected


    Let's first establish that Ross was not just another lighter weight champion of his day - he was an exciting and popular champion who drew massive crowds and hype, much like Oscar De La Hoya in today's boxing world.

    Let us also realise that the man was a genuine war hero, awarded the Silver Star for his nothing-more-than sheer heroic exploits during the second world war. Not that this has any effect on his boxing rating, but learning this fact may be the first breeze to help sway your opinion. That is, if there is actually anyone out there who doesn't already know about Ross.

    Why should Barney Ross be in everyone's top ten? If I were to guess, I shouldn't think many more than 5% of us include him at present - he tends to normally be recognised as a good triple weight champion and features in the lower top twenty or sometimes thirty.

    Let's continue with how good a performer he was. In an era where even the greats seemed to lose regularly, he was the epitome of consistency and professionalism at its finest, retiring with a record of 72-4-3, somewhat helped by his glorious amateur career in the '20s where he honed his craft over two hundred and fifty unpaid bouts. Ross was thought to be the best fighter since Benny Leonard and perhaps on par.

    Professional championship credentials?:

    - Lightweight champion, one defence.

    - Light welterweight champion, ten defences.

    - Two time welterweight champion, two defences.

    Had Ross existed in a weaker era, he'd probably have reigned supreme. He did anyway - but we'd be talking about title defence figures in the twenties.

    Ross' record against Ring rated opponents*:

    Ray Miller
    Johnny Farr (x2)
    Tommy Grogan
    Joe Ghnouly
    Sammy Fuller
    Pete Nebo
    Frankie Klick (x2)
    Bobby Pacho (x2)
    Baby Joe Gans
    Ceferino Garcia (x3)
    Chuck Woods (x2)
    Izzy Jannazzo

    Battling Battalino
    Billy Petrolle (x2)
    Tony Canzoneri (x2)
    Jimmy McLarnin (x2)

    *End of year ratings, Hall of Famers in bold

    Compared to the rest of my own top ten, Ross' record is slightly thin on the quantity of contenders side of things, even though he beat world challengers more times than Carlos Ortiz, for instance. However, like Ortiz, Ross' proved to be the best of a strong era at the top end of the scale. What also bodes well for him is the fact he rarely lost. Between his loss to Roger Bernard, still in the early days of his relatively short career, and his final stand against Armstrong, Ross went 55-1-1 over a seven year span. The only loss came against Jimmy McLarnin - the draw, controversial, at the hands of contender Frankie Klick.

    Going by my own list, he beat two fighters in the top twenty pound-for-pound, in their prime, going 4-1.

    Never knocked out either, not even in his last fight against Henry Armstrong.

    1. Henry Armstrong
    2. Harry Greb
    3. Ray Robinson
    4. Sam Langford
    5. Benny Leonard
    6. Ezzard Charles
    7. Roberto Duran
    8. Willie Pep
    9. Archie Moore
    10. Barney Ross

    14. Tony Canzoneri

    17. Jimmy McLarnin

    --

    Thoughts?
     
  2. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    36,581
    Likes Received:
    21,312
    Close to it IMO..Lock for top 20 Ive come to realise.

    But my anti-semitism just cant bring me to do it.
     
  3. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Messages:
    7,766
    Likes Received:
    94
    :patsch:lol:

    Does Benny Leonard suffer?

    It seems I'm a fan of the jews.
     
  4. Rise Above

    Rise Above IBHOF elector Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2007
    Messages:
    8,038
    Likes Received:
    39
    I personally think he is just outside the top ten but I can see how the argument can be made for him to be a top ten guy.
     
  5. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Messages:
    7,766
    Likes Received:
    94
    He has a completely different kind of record to the man I rate one place above him. Need to be fair to all, I think. Barney Ross was consistency and quality in a short space of time while Archie Moore was quantity and longevity.
     
  6. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    23,796
    Likes Received:
    2,396
    Barney Ross was under Benny Leonard but still an ATG
     
  7. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    36,581
    Likes Received:
    21,312
    :D

    I had Leonard in the 10 for a while but I think he should sit about on the cusp..Around 10-11.

    Ive always had him a little higher then Barney
     
  8. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Messages:
    3,829
    Likes Received:
    27
    His book is a must read
     
  9. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    20,449
    Likes Received:
    55
    Ross defently belongs in the top 10.
     
  10. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    100
    Which of the following fighters would he displace to enter into the top 10 and why?

    Harry Greb
    Sugar Ray Robinson

    Ezzard Charles
    Sam Langford
    Benny Leonard
    Willie Pep
    Roberto Duran
    Henry Armstrong

    Joe Gans

    Archie Moore
     
  11. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    100
    Well, bothering to read Manassa's post before I actually responded this time, the answer is obviously Gans, lol.

    I'm ok with Barney being top 10, but I'd have Gans above him myself....

    I don't detract much from Gans for the McGovern farce or the Langford loss.

    Btw, where would Packey McFarland rank for you Manassa?
     
  12. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    11,935
    Likes Received:
    100
    I'd rate Ross over both Pep and Gans, and possibly Moore as well. Ross was just as great as them in his prime weight class but also had more success at the higher ones.
     
  13. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    17,376
    Likes Received:
    309
    not even top 3 at LW...
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    279
    Looking at other LWs who also became WW champs, I would rate Armstrong, Duran, Napoles, Whitaker, Mayweather, Pacquaio over him and probably Chavez and Arguello to around that weight range
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    82,426
    Likes Received:
    1,478
    Yep, no.10 for me, has been for a while.

    Also clear on the small amount of film I've seen that he was a damn good fighter.

    Didn't disgrace himself against Armstrong IMO. Which was his final fight if I'm not wrong.

    It's fighters like McClarnin I have trouble ranking. Just haven't delved into them enough yet. Any footage available of McClarnin? At work and can't get on the tube :good