BBBC Possibly Could Withhold Fraudley's Purse!

Harrison, Kevin Johnson, yes, anybody who goes into a televised world title fight and doesn't care to fight is absolutely ****ing over whomever is paying them and shouldn't get paid. It's disgraceful. And that Harrison pretty much became the only man in history that made KJ look like the heavyweight Manny Pacquiao, he should be made an example of.

 

worst heavyweight championship fight of ALLTIME"!!

 

Yeah, they suspect a gang called, get this, "The sword boys" in fixing it.


"The sword boys"...:rofl...But, seriously, Danny Green has an ATG jab...much like Audley.

 

Pay him, but make it contingent opun him never setting foot in a boxing ring again, or Britain for that matter.

 

They did.
BBBC is the British Boxing Board of Control, not the BBC (British Broadcasting Company).

 

I remember Audleys.

Thrown: 32
Landed: 1

That one must've been the glancing jab that was shown as the highlight of the 2nd round. ****ing Joke :bart

 

They dont have legal right to do anything of that sort.

 

Why not?

 

If Harrison landed that massive jab on Haye which Green did on Briggs, they'd still be collecting Haye's teeth from the back row seats.

 

What, like "you must fight my brother and then rematch me if you win.":hi:

 

Surely they can't do that.

Its not exactly Audley's fault. He's a terrible fighter who got put in the ring with a Good fighter, so of course he was going to get beat. People should be happy it lasted 3 rounds. I thought it woud be over in 60 seconds.

It would be like someone saying they'll pay me a million to step in the ring with Mike Tyson, then after I get demolished saying. Yeh you didn't fight well enough i'm not paying you.

Just pay the man his money, he just performed like he always does, a timid boxer, who's scared to get hit doesn't throw much and got a week chin.

 

I understand. But they don't regulate a contract between him and Haye.

Who are they, from a legal point of view, to take his purse? It's not this easy and won't happen.

 

They have set a precedent and rescinded purses before.

 

Because withholding someone’s purse, based only on someone’s opinion that he didn’t put good enough fight, will not hold water in any court.

 

I personally think that you can't take anything from his purse in this case, because he performed exactly how he always does. This is no different from any other performance of his, so he has not underperformed.

However, my original point was that the BBBoC do have the authority to do this, as they have done so before without any legal repercussions