Benn fails drug test

Chris Eubank Sr. will make new revelations on Friday.

 

I heard Sr has been threatened.

 

???

 

This content is protected

The man is vermin

 

unreal. Not even the most ardent on ‘No Context Hearn’ gimps can defend him this past fortnight.

 

How has a boxer not just KTFO Hearn by now. Talks so much **** about fighters he has no business with.

 

Eubank Sr saying Matchroom tried to pay him to be in Junior’s corner

 

I haven’t watched any of the Hearn interviews. Has any interviewer yet challenged his claims that the drug wouldn’t have benefited Benn by pointing out it is a crucial drug for PCT after steroid cycles?

Doesn’t surprise me they will have wanted him involved in some capacity to drive the PPV buys. I bet Hearn would have even put on a “gloves are off” between Nigel and Chris Sr if both were willing.

 

This content is protected

This shed a better light on the Board, and as I think many suspected Matchroom are just pushing their luck

 

Typical rattled Hearn

 

No they haven’t. The pre approved questions essentially allow him to comment unopposed that the level found in Benn would not be of a benefit and that it would be a silly drug to take as it stays in the system.

No mention of a cycle, on the masking element, why it has been found in Benn and of fighter welfare either.

 

Kugan's interview with Gareth A Davies yesterday, Kugan said, "we obviously know of the legal technicalities and why we can't speak about it".

How would a powder puff arselicking youtuber like Kugan know of the legal technicalities of the case and why would it stop you from talking about it.

He's such such a muppet honestly. There isn't a bigger muppet in boxing right now than Kugan Cassius.

 

Trying to come across more important than he really is.

 

Kugan is just an incel who managed to lose his virginity through Hearn. Warrants zero respect.

 

It's this type of "ask a question, let Hearn answer with his misinformation/omissions/irrelevant comparisons, then not press him on his answers" bs that really gets on my wick. It allows his bs to be the narrative "out there" in Medialand, and it gets repeated time and time again, it becomes "the truth" in the eyes of many.

There doesn't seem to be a popular outlet which collects all his bs and counters it.
There's a few "fact check" type websites out there for political stuff, ....... we need an "EddieCheck.com" website