What does that have to do with this thread? Grow up fanboy, nobody can be bothered having a ***** with you. The answer to the question is Mayweather. Take your desire for a petty squabble about Pacquiao onto some other thread where there are like-minded children for you to play with.
You are listing achievements, accomplishments, your personal opinions, blah blah blah. Resume is the names and the condition those guys were in, it is the standard of opposition and the winning performances. Mayweather's resume is stronger. Remove your head from Joe's anal cavity and check their resumes on boxrec, then come back onto this thread and admit you didn't know what resume meant. :good
Nope. When you are evaluating someone's career, talk about who they did not fight. When evaluating the strength of a resume, you are concerned only with the opposition they did fight and how those fights went. It's not rocket science.
I have no desire for a petty squabble,im just highlighting your hypocricy,calling other fans maniacs,as if you're not misguided and extreme in your devotion to Pac. 'People in glass houses'....Thats the connection to the thread.
But this thread isn't about me, it's about Mayweather and Calzaghe, and I believe anyone voting for Joe is a biased fanboy. My support of Pacquiao has no relevance whatsoever to this thread, so go look for a fanboy bitching session elsewhere you sad child.