Better resume Froch or Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ajackman1, Jul 11, 2012.

  1. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2006
    Messages:
    16,769
    Likes Received:
    32
    No...

    Bernard Hopkins had not been able to fight a full hard 12 rounds for years.. Taylor showed that before he fought Calzaghe. Calzaghe's style was perfect outwork an old man Hopkins.. Pavlik's was one dimensional and made for Hopkins.. Tarver was old himself, and never really that great and gassed himself a lot(Would have lost against Roy in the 3rd fight if Roy would have fought)

    I have always picked the 28 year old Hopkins that fought Jones, over the 43 year old Hopkins that had to fake low blows to get rest.
     
  2. rorschach51

    rorschach51 A Legend & A Gentleman Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2012
    Messages:
    12,195
    Likes Received:
    8,408
    Froch, by a substantial amount already, and the gap is widening.
     
  3. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,224
    Likes Received:
    2
    the cobra has the better resume imo.

    froch- magee, reid, pascal, taylor, dirrell, kessler, abraham, johnson, ward and bute, not to mention a bunch of these fights came in succession.

    calzaghe- eubank, reid, brewer, lacy, bika, kessler, hopkins and jones.

    calzaghe's got the better single win in hopkins, beat kessler and fought the better reid, but outside of that, overall it goes to froch as far as i'm concerned.