Fury get the nod from me for consistency, he's always talking himself up. Though I do remember Froch saying that he would have beaten Hagler & Leonard..... And Calzaghe.........
Its a close one Fury is the more traditional say as much as you can talk the talk and gets in with a fair few good one liners. Froch on the other hand is slightly more understated its a slower more thoughtful **** talking and the dry subtle wit comes in but he does seem more wooden and forced in his delivery sometimes. I will have to side with Fury this time because he is a loveable rogue that just doesnt care but i admire Froch and hold him in high regard
i'm not sure either are really **** talkers because i think that both of tham really believe they are as talented and can beat the people they claim they can beat. they are just delusional. **** talkers are the fighters who know they not that talented but claim they are the greatest and can beat great fighters. boxers like this that come to mind are michael gomez and matty hatton.
Fury done nothing but claming himself to be great to be fair frich did the same in his early days but then he backed it up! so fair play to him probably my fav fighter at the mo
My view exactly. I used to think Froch just talked ****, but now I look at his fights and think okay, you called it. Whereas Fury would seriously surprise me if he achieved half his claimed future.