Wow, excellent post.. I will say it is between Vitali and Roy.. Both have very strong cases. But since Roy ducked Vitali, I would have to lean towards giving Roy the award.
When Hop called out Froch the fight wasn't met with much interest. Go pull out the threads and read them for yourself. Next subject. What part of this dont you understand.- The WBC world super-middleweight title final eliminator between the British champion Carl Froch and Russia's Denis Inkin, postponed because Inkin was suffering from a virus. Both are undefeated and the winner will be installed as mandatory challenger to the world champion, Joe Calzaghe. So how was Froch mando when he was still fighting his way thru the eliminator? Yes he was in talks to fight Hopkins. He still ducked Froch.
You're telling me im wrong so its up to you to prove me wrong. You gotto get the threads yourself. He ducked Froch to fight Hopkins but he had already turned down 5million from Hennessey before. You said he was never Joe's mando , which i proved he was. That is the argument here, one you keep trying to change.
I don't quite understand this one Dino.. Hopkins was a bigger name than Froch at the time, a World champ at LHW and and it was a PPV fight in America. Hopkins was also rated very high P4P on most lists as well. Not hard for me to understand why Joe fought Hopkins instead. That doesn't qualify as a duck in my opinion.
Floyd. Roy didnt really duck . In order to duck the opponent has to bevable to hang with u in the ring no one hangs with prime roy.
Joe wanted no part of roy go look at his book. Hopkins was offerd the fight 60/ 40 didnt take it. Roy would hav took collins eubank and benn to school.