I watched the corley v sanchez fight and i culdnt believe that desicion he even knock sanchez down. even DLH said that corley won
Chavez vs Whitaker, Pea won easily and I agree with Socrates, Dawson vs Johnson. Johnson had him out on his feet on quite a few occasions.
Hating on Calzaghe again...seems like at least 20% of your posts are dedicated to this. Here is a post you should visit because it sure seems that way. http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=160086 for me Jone-olympics Chavez- Sweet pea Foreman- Shultz Lennox Lewis - Holyfield I
if you think hatton collazo was the biggest robbery you've seen, i'm assuming you haven't seen many boxing matches? it was a very close hatton win and at the most generous it could be is a very close collazo win.
I consider the Tyson-Holyfield fights robberies. In my opinion Holyfield should have been disqualified in both of them.
Another ****ing idiot who doesn't know the difference between a robbery and a close fight that could have gone either way.:-( A robbery is Pea-Chavez or RJJ-Olympics a close fight is like Cotto-Clottey or Winky-Vargas learn the difference dumbass.:deal
Becasue it wasn't a robbery. You already proved you don't know **** about the sport in your previous thread about OScar. PBF-JLC 1 wasn't a robbery it was a close fight that could have gone either way educate yourself before saying such stupid ****. A robbery is a fight that is so one sided that there's absolutely no doubt the wrong guy won and going by that PBF-JLC 1 doesn't fit the discription of a robbery as a case can be made for both men wining.:deal
Neither of those two were robberies.atsch They were close fights that could have gone either way. Get it right.