Perhaps not 20, but ingles physique for a man his age carries a suspicion of steroid use. So he's not exactly setting a great example. For that reason alone it's hard to blame people for pointing the finger at the ingle gym. Ingle probably needs to get tested as clean himself to lead by example. ...Not to mention KGs positive test too. No proof, but there is some grounds for suspicion....
...er...HELLO.....have you ever heard of " leading by example"? What a stupid, ignorant thing to say....have a rethink and cop yourself on!
You joking me here? Is ingle a boxer? A professional athlete of any kind who has rules to follow? No, he isn’t. If he decides to take PEDs, that’s completely his own choice, which he has the complete right to do, which is FULLY legal and is not against any rule. He isn’t fighting people and potentially killing people on a regular basis. However, his fighters do have rules to follow, and tling PEDs would be against these rules and get them a ban, and they are punching people on a regular basis trying to hurt them, potentially manslaughter, so to compare the two, is quite frankly absurd. They are not comparable.
I never joke with someone too dumb to get the joke. It would be unfair. So no, I'm not joking. Suggest you look up things like "role model" and 'leading by example".
Shut up you idiot, I suggest you look up the word ‘logical’. As there is zero logic to what your saying. I like how some moron posters like yourself fail to reply with a productive response, but instead just reply with stupidity, and with nothing at all to actually explain your opinion. I don’t want to be to harsh on you because you are clearly on the learning disability spectrum. I would say at the very low end (IQ = 30).
Ingle get tested? Stop being such a ****ing idiot. Why the hell would he ever get tested? THERE IS NOTHING ILLEGAL, IMMORAL OR UNETHICAL with ingle taking PEDs. Swear to god, your an absolute idiot. Do you even realise PEDs are COMPLETELY legal?
true enough, i watched a bit of that terrible presser with browne where whyte was screaming 'junkie junkie' at browne, who then responds with, well, you've been done for the same thing. i had no idea, whereas with other fighters its bought up constantly to remind you of their transgressions.
Look up “guilt by association” . Ingles suspected ped use puts his boxers under a cloud of suspicion. Him testing clean would maybe dispel such suspicion. Do you understand?
You want logic? Ok here's some for you. It's called Duck Logic....and it goes like this: "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck.....then it's probably a duck". This applies (perhaps unfairly I know) to the ingle gym. If ingle and KG ( the gym boss himself and one of its star boxers) look like they're on PEDs, walk like they're on PEDS, and quack like they're on PEDs ...then a lot of people will assume drug use is present in the Ingle gym. So it follows from this that Ingle being implicated in drug use IS relevant. Do you understand?
No, because now you’ve added KG to the equation, which doesn’t form any part of our debate. Also, to make assumptions based on association is completely wrong, it’s rarely going To be a Correct assumption. To reiterate - there is nothing wrong with ingle using PEDs. And the fact is, there is absolutely no proof he’s even using PEDs. He’s a big bloke but there are many blokes MUCH bigger who have never touched a steroid in their life.