Bob Satterfield vs 70S George Foreman

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Oct 20, 2017.

  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    17,460
    Likes Received:
    12,892
    Both were big punchers, but Satterfield was ~180 pounds. Could he land the big one and put Foreman out or is Satterfield doomed?
     
  2. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    12,714
    Likes Received:
    3,475
    Would be like a "cruiser" bouncing shells off a "battleship". (see Norton vs Foreman)
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,996
    Likes Received:
    28,006
    Satterfield is doomed.

    He would not be a cruiser bouncing shells off a battleship, more an ocean liner with 15'' guns trying to win a fight with a battleship.
     
  4. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    12,714
    Likes Received:
    3,475
    Good analsis compadre ^ ( i.e. The British BShip Hood had very little deck armor in its battle with the Bismark and we know how that turned out)
     
  5. Ice cold boxing

    Ice cold boxing New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2017
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    14
    This is bad for saterfield, he doesn’t have the chin to stand foreman’s shots
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    55,226
    Likes Received:
    49,564
    Perfect.
     
  7. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    27,676
    Likes Received:
    7,669
    This is a bad fight for Satterfeild. Foreman was on another level entirely than Cleveland Williams.
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    55,226
    Likes Received:
    49,564
    This content is protected