Brad Hollywood Pitt

Oganov quit because he was fed up with the ref allowing Pitt to constantly foul. Pulling his head down, pushing victor off him with two arms, pushing victor with a forarm etc. It wasnt because he was being bashed stupid.

The swing over the head wasnt what put Pitt down either, it mearly assisted him as Geale and Ramond sitting ringside stated, the left hook set it all up & did the damage, pitts legs were gone, he knew it and its why he spat out his mouthguard on purpose twice during that round, once during the knockdown and again afterwards.

I put up a classic example of a foul that Hatton committed against KT< did KT have to wait for the referee to call a foul before taking the knee? i dont think so. In any event the ref did call an accidental foul so no count need be applied, the main issue here as i see it is that Pitt was hurt by a legit punch, count was applied and picked up by the referee, starting at 5, making his way to 8 then stopping the count to pick up Pitts mouthguard. On that basis the ref should have stoped the count at 8, asked Pitt if he was ok to contuine, Rub his gloves then get it on, he was hurt, spat it out on purpose, he should be given NO REST or time to Recover, it is unfair to his opponent to do so, Pitts people would not like this sht done to Pitt so whys it ok when its occured to one of his opponents? Whats good for the goose is good for the gander!

Good to hear a protest has been lodged, the commision should rule this a NC and order a rematch. I favour Victor in the rematch to win. He will stop Pitt inside of 3 rounds.

 

:rofl
You have never read the rules and you think you can give an opinion about the conduct of the fight.

Carry on spinner.

 

Oganov ended up in a pretty (read really) bad way in the change rooms after the fight. In the long run it wasn't a great fight for his long term health.

 

yeah cause im the one spinning about Oganov taking a knee from a foul. come on show us the rule in which it states a fighter is to be given an 8 count if he takes a knee from a foul.

you said if i needed help with the rules you would show me, your the one who claimed Oganov should have been counted out when he took the knee so show us all what you derive your information from, surely it cant be that pea size brain of yours, your not being objective in this topic and have your tounge firmly stuck up either Lincons ass or Pitts, or possibly a combination of both.

Your more concern about the ref not applying an 8 count over a foul than you are over a legit knockdown, stoping the count to pick up a fcking mouthguard, for real are you Pitts Mum, relative or inlove with lincon hudson cause no rational person would carry on the way you have, especiially when there is video evidence for everyone to see, you thnk we were all born yesterday:rofl

 

******, you're the one claiming that Oganov took a knee because of a foul, ie. a thumb from an uppercut. It's not a foul you ****ing nuffy. That's why I'm asking you to show me the rule that says it's one. I know it's not in there and you've just made it up.

It's obvious you're just a bitter little midget. Brad achieved much more in his am career than you could ever dream of. In fact, I'm sure Brad fought and won at the state titles when you made your failed attempt to fight for the Association. He represented Oz at the worlds that year off memory and then won gold at the Comm Games the following year (yep, those same Comm Games that you couldn't qualify for).

You want the rules? Ring Noel Sharp. You call him for just about everything else.

 

"Pitt was school captian when he was in high school, unless u been school capitan like Brad then fck off" - Johnny boy!

It was ruled a foul, your crying over spilt milk, hows about stopping a count to pick up a mouthguard, did you find that one in the rule book fckknuckles!:huh

you said you had the rules now you say i got to phone someone else for them, just gets better and better with you :rofl:nut

 

So you're happy with the ref's wrong call in Oganov's favour, but you can't stop whinging about the perceived favours in Pitt's favour.

I reconsidered. I'm not your lackey. Why would I need to give you the rules when you claim to know them already. All you have to do post the sections you're relying on. It shouldn't be too hard. If you have trouble finding them ask your local librarian for some help.

 

What WRONG CALL you farkn idiot? :nut an unintentional injury not caused by a punch warrants no 10 count. Where does it say in the rule book that tossing a guy onto his back is a foul? it doesnt but it was ruled a NC for hopkins V dawson, similar situation here. i will repeate myself again, AN INJURY NOT CAUSED BY A PUNCH DOES NOT WARRANT A 10 count.

percievided favours? are you blind, go look how many times Pitt pushes, pulls Oganovs head down etc and its not as if Oganov isnt complaining about it, the ref ignores it and allows Pitt to blantaly foul, a tactic that is being used on victor, it not legal and is unfair. This is the same guy who stoped a 10 count at 8 to pick up Pitts mouthguard and give him a 30 second rest.

You reconsiderd hahah? you dont know the rules, you just bluffed , i called your bluff and you dont have nothing but egg all over your face right now :rofl hahah

Ive posted video evidence, case refrences.. but thats not good enough for you, ya need the rules, the same ones that you claim are sitting right next to you in a booklet hahaha! fck off you dick puller, go send Pitt and Hudson a bunch of red roses you one eyed midget living in the land of the blind! :thumbsup

What ever you do, dont tell Hudson he pads his fighters records or he will send you a lawyers letter! hahaha

This content is protected

Why dont Linc post on that thread and accuse people who responded or personally attacking him?

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=371695

 

your bias is sickening it always comes back to a grudge pathetic waste of good skin there will be much celebration in your wake you slimey little ****

 

You can't help but shoot yourself in the foot. If your comments weren't so bad, why were they removed by the site's owner?

Keep flapping your gums, and proving what a witless, pathetic little man you really are.

 

i'm astounded.

by that, i'd say 95% of the things said on this forum would be court material ffs.

i mean seriously, u guys have see how low many people go on here and talk smack about someone, but others just tell them their a goose and laugh and move on to the next topic.

imo, if a boxer is gunna get offended by bad comments about them, then don't go on the forum and read it.

 

**** you're a boring ****.

I've got better things to do than to waste time educating you on the rules.

http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/D...94816ef2946ca256e5b00213aec/$FILE/96-036a.pdf

egg + face = Ty

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

:good

 

Numb nuts, the laughting my ass off icons prob dont explain much, but one cant help but do such a thing when a fckwit like you who claims to know everything just posted a link to something that isnt even relevant to the discussion, in other words,you posted the wrong link ya fcking Mr know it all moron! :rofl:rofl:rofl ive been pissing myself laughing for the past 20 min.

search that document for corner, 8 count, knockdown or anything related to the rules of a referee and its not existant haha

Show us all exactly what section refers to 8 counts, knockdowns and fouls? you fcking iiiiiiiiiiiiiiidiooooooooooooot! hahahahahahaa :rofl:rofl:rofl