Bradley-Campbell decision overturned

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by ishy, Aug 24, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. Mazallan

    Mazallan ESB yes man Full Member

    7,522
    0
    Jun 25, 2009
    Seems about right. Will there be a rematch now?
     
    Mazallan, Aug 25, 2009
    Mazallan, Aug 25, 2009
    #16
  2. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    slip&counter, Aug 25, 2009
    slip&counter, Aug 25, 2009
    #17
  3. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    good move IMO
     
    GPater11093, Aug 25, 2009
    GPater11093, Aug 25, 2009
    #18
  4. mcguirpa

    mcguirpa Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,957
    106
    Feb 15, 2009
    I'm tempted to say Campbell won't go within a berjillion of miles of Bradley after the last fight. Lets face it, Nate could see clearly and chickened out bigtime.

    But money talks.
     
    mcguirpa, Aug 25, 2009
    mcguirpa, Aug 25, 2009
    #19
  5. Losfer_Words

    Losfer_Words Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,385
    1
    May 30, 2009
    Although I accept you opine that Bradley was dominating, the 'quiting' allegations have been proven to be baseless. Nate had bleeding behind the eye and, had he fought on, there was a very high probability that he would have had permanent damage to his vision and, in the worst case scenario, he could have lost his sight.
     
    Losfer_Words, Aug 25, 2009
    Losfer_Words, Aug 25, 2009
    #20
Page 2 of 2