Bradley has more chance in a rematch than he did in the first fight.

Bradley wasn't there to be hit and with a healthy foot I expect him to dominate Pac in the rematch.

 

I usually never go with compubox numbers...but it's OBVIOUS Bradley was outclassed..but a WIDE MARGIN

 

His foot is being massively overstated. He wasn't limping around the ring, so it was obviously manageable during the fight. At the end of the 12th round, he was still moving fine, so whilst it's likely he did do something, I highly doubt it was anything serious or overly restrictive.

 

Bradley circling to the left took Manny's straight left away mostly. His jab kept Manny out of range, and he ambushed him when he had him turned the right way. If he would have gotten back outside quick enough, this would have been a great fight for him. He gave some rounds away by trying to trade with Pac.

 

Got thoroughly outboxed?? How can you outbox someone when you can't cut off the ring hit them with a jab or unable to land your best punch in the latter rounds? Bradley figured Pac out and outboxed him down the stretch it couldn't be any more clear. You're just mad because the man you said was the truth looked average at best he was one-dimensional and one-handed. You better pray to God that he never gets in the ring with Money.:deal

 

Yes Manny outclassed Bradley in looking confused, not actually throwing anything, not landing anything, and running out of gas in the championship rounds.

Bradley schooled Manny in the sport called boxing.

 

Last time I checked you have to actually land punches to win a fight... Bradley landed what.. 19%? get outta here

 

Like I said, you're either idiotic, trolling, racist or you hate Pacquiao if you think any of that is true.

Bradley knew he lost, his trainer knew he lost, his wife knew he lost, his dad knew he lost, his cutman knew he lost. Absolutely none of the people closest to Bradley or him himself thought he won. If he was being honest, which he isn't, he'd admit he lost. His body language was that of a beaten man.

So, yeah, keep arguing he won or did well, when it was painfully obvious to even the most biased people that he didn't.

 

And still outlanded Manny in every round

ONly in round 3 did Manny land anything significant that gave him the round.

 

He's an idiot. I genuinely think he has mental problems because his scorecards are always a long way off the truth. He had Chisora winning a shut out against Vitali or something like that.

His argument may as well be "Bradley knocked down Pacquiao 8 times, of course he won". It'd be as deluded as the **** he comes out with. He's fabricating something which quite clearly didn't happen.

 

You must genuinely be ******ed... how did Bradley out land Pac every single round..yet the final numbers are STILL in Pac's favor? I'm a fan of the sport, not of 1 fighter...Pac did lose to Marquez, but this fight..was not even close.

 

Makes me laugh, the hoopla and hype around this decision is almost worse than the decision itself. Bradley did some credible work, didn't deserve the victory but certainly wasn't shut out in the fight.

 

Best post ever.

 

What final numbers? From the two dudes with the laptop with a history of unreliable measuring?

I'm a fan of the sport as well, which is why I gave the vight to the non-money fighter.

 

"Bradley has more chance in a rematch than he did in the first fight."

That as far from the truth as can be. Bradley has ZERO chance in the rematch.

Pac will actually fight next time. That's Arums' master plan:

Have Pac throw the first fight, promote (in-house fighter) Bradley as the "Pac Killer," sell a gazillion PPV's for the rematch, then let Pac destroy Bradley and retire richer than some Arab sheik.

(If you think Pac was actually trying to win Sat night, you're either blind or have never seen Pac fight before.)

---------------

Bradley has extremely limited skills, so this is the best way for Uncle Bob to make money with him. There is no long-range plan for Bradley.