BREAKING NEWS Povetkin's B sample positive

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Leoh, May 26, 2016.


  1. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009

    What agenda is that you muppet?

    It's hard to believe you are a moran enough to think I'm protecting Pov? Seriously, can you be that ****ing stupid?
     
  2. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,252
    12,646
    Mar 26, 2009
    Trace amounts of a substance that was legal at the time.

    A substance that has no proven impact on performance

    And Deonkey pulls out

    And I said Deonkey would find a way to pull out of this fight

    And he did
     
  3. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    Your agenda is clear and others see it too. Go back to your first reply to me in this thread. Which part of my comment did you highlight and respond to? It was the small part about the Hauser article and Mayweather. And that is all you have been debating, since. You want to give an "expert" opinion and speak passionately about Mayweather's alleged cheating and this so called web of corruption by USADA and NSAC. Yet, you are not nearly as resourceful when it comes to speaking out against PEDvetkin's use of banned substances in an attempt to cheat and gain an advantage. You should display the same zeal for what's right and fair in this scenario, instead of trying to steer the conversation to Mayweather, when he was already deemed blameless in the matter. But, we both know why you aren't doing that. And you are getting exposed in the Doug Fischer related thread for the same reason.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
     
  4. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009

    Don't reply to my posts anymore you ****ing muppet. You make **** up and can never answer a question. You then get on your demographic stock agenda when pushed into a corner and blame everyone for being a Povetkin fan. Haha, ****ing morans. Is this the extent of your ability to debate? Got nothing, call them all Pov fans? Pro tip, I am always consistent on PEDs. And you took my posts at the beginning of this thread telling posters to calm down essentially as protecting Povetkin. Lmao... whose got the agenda now? Where you pretend to give two ****s about PEDs while ignoring Fluids clear and obvious doping and corruption in NSAC and USADA. GFTO.

    http://www.boxingforum24.com/showpost.php?p=17957311&postcount=56
     
  5. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    Lol....your posts aren't worth replying to; because, you immediately start with insults as soon as you are challenged. You act like a whining b!tch trying to come off as fair and impartial, then show yourself to have a clear bias in the same breath.

    You want to link me to another thread, yet in THIS thread all you talk about are "Flos" and Mayweather. You want people to wait on the full article when it comes to PEDvetkin. But, a full year AFTER this Mayweather situation (which never had legs to begin with) has proven nothing, in terms of him doing anything wrong (I know...you still have hope), you are still spewing the same sh! t about IVs, cheating and corruption every single chance you get. Still mad...lol.

    That's the sh!t I am talking about. Be zealous ALL the time on the subject...no matter who it is. Otherwise, you come off as "disingenuous." And you WILL be called out on it...if not by me, someone else (which I see you have been in the Doug Fischer thread...lol). Taking L's all over the place. [emoji2] SMH.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
     
  6. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    :good