Broner: "I'll fight Rios at catchweight"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by polowear28, Jul 21, 2012.


  1. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    can you reread my post and find where I put my opinion on it one way or the other. When Broner called out Demarco, Marquez and Rios, I ignored the last 2 fights because Rios is with Top Rank and Marquez won't fight him. I didn't even entertain the fight.
     
  2. kwilson71

    kwilson71 #MAYDAY Full Member

    3,858
    0
    Feb 28, 2012
    There is nothing wrong with catchweights, as long as your not trying to win belts at them.

    Broner has also said that he would go up to 140 to meet Rios, he has been chasing Rios for awhile now.
     
  3. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Shut the **** up no backpedaling here *****
     
  4. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    *****s are confused band of idiots.
     
  5. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    back pedaling from what you dumb *****. Go back to crying about Ortiz. I thought you only came back because you were trying to find friends? :huh
     
  6. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    :patsch:lol:

    I love the agenda twisting going on here.
     
  7. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Keep bringing up **** that has nothin to do with our discussion it lets us see your true colors here, in fact go bump a thread as if it has some sort of effect on me kid :roll:
     
  8. kwilson71

    kwilson71 #MAYDAY Full Member

    3,858
    0
    Feb 28, 2012
    :huh
     
  9. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Look man, I got nothing against you really, but the way you come at me draws the reactions I get. When I see you argue with other people in threads, for the most part, I stay out of it. At one point, I thought we were cool, but you've become a real jackass.

    Like I've already been saying before, I didn't give my opinion on this fight at all, because I knew it wasn't going to happen. If they did fight at a catchweight, I would have been critical, but this is how I look at it.

    Rios just fought a 135. Broner just fought at 130 (didn't make weight). Broner is moving up and would probably want Rios at 135, but he knows he has difficulty making weight, so in this case, a catchweight is better than 135. I would prefer the fight be at 140, but here's a few things.

    I don't expect Broner to jump 2 divisions (he did surprise me though and said he would.)
    I don't expect Rios to come down at a catchweight either. Both of them aren't obligated to do either one, but if he fight happens, make it at 140.
     
  10. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    You need to understand that some people are not going to say what you want to hear. The bottom line is when I see someone being a hypocrite ima call you out on it.

    ANd thats the case with the *****sapiens they talk all this **** but Floyd has done all of that.
     
  11. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    :lol::good
     
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    *****s: i don't like catchweights when pac is in it.
    *****s: floyd-marquez @144, broner wanting rios at catchweight, floyd wanting hamed @ 128, ortiz fighiting berto @ 146 are all ok.
     
  13. RJJFan

    RJJFan Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    14,002
    6,964
    Sep 5, 2010
    Its difficult to take *****s seriously isn't it? :patsch
     
  14. kwilson71

    kwilson71 #MAYDAY Full Member

    3,858
    0
    Feb 28, 2012
    There is a difference between just fighting at a catch weight and actually winning titles at them.

    If your going for someone belt I think it should be at the weight they actually have the belt at. I didn't like it when Ray Leonard did it, don't like it when Pac does it, and if Broner tries to win a belt at 138 and call himself the jr WW champion he will be criticized for it as well.:good
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    belts are **** anyways for the elite guys. these guys make the belts and not the other way around. i care more for the match-up and the opponent's quality.