Broner> the overrated Valero

So...because Pac beat Hatton better than Mayweather did, that means Pac is better than Floyd? Your logic holds no weight.

Broner has good skills. But here are some things that makes Valero dangerous and serve as the right tools to knock Broner out: volume punching, underrated footwork, speed, power, heart, iron chin, good stamina, and probably his best asset: hunger.

You're not looking at Valero's talent. You're going by numbers or what you see in the record books and that's not always the whole story. Even before Broner became a champ any real boxing fan can see he has great talent. Valero was NOT one dimensional. He's not as polished or technically sound as Broner but he had what it took to knock anyone out. Pacquiao once had crude (but special) tools and look how far that got him.

 

People seem to have watched a completely different fight. If you ACTUALLY watched Valero v Demarco you would see that most of the fighting was done on the outside with Demarco backing up throwing jabs and occasional right hand. Against Broner DeMarco wasn't able to box him on the outside or chose not to and instead fought him on the inside where Broners shorter arms and faster hands gave him a huge advantage.

 

valero was a wild fighter, pacman before he fought jmm is what valero reminded me of. he was good fighter but to compare him to boxer like broner was always some dumb ****. they asked that question many of times on different sites. could broner beat demarco worse then valero did ? the answer is yes but now you will here valero ruined him and demarco was a chump. its funny how you read one thing before the fight and something different in the next fight. broner can fight and box, he dont have to run, has power and speed and a smart fighter in the ring. late them hate, the hated on floyd and it would not be right if they aint hate on broner as well.

 

Valero walks Broner down and stops him late rounds. PrinceN and Royal T-bag only think Broner would win cos he's 'G' and cos of his skin colour cos thats all they care about.

 

valero was wild yes. but he was surprisingly good with his feet, and when he wanted to be, hard to hit. he was also intimidating as ****. Made his last 2 opponents quit on their stool, he had that fear factor. I loved the way he looped his hooks, made them look like they could reach round any guard.

 

:deal

Bingo

Those two and Cableaddict are the same person

 

You can be forgiven for thinking that – seeing as though he beat Demarco in more devastating fashion. But that argument hold little weight. It’s like saying Pac >> Mayweather because he beat Cotto and Hatton more impressively.

And if I remember correctly, Valero, despite taking longer to break him down, gave Demarco far less success than what Broner did. He also wasn’t very aggressive that night; opting to box more than he usually does.

 

Demarco leaning in open for the uppercuts and his inactivity while leaning in had nothing to do with him getting knocked the **** out.atsch

 

I'm finna bump this thread when the hypetrain gets derailed.

 

Yo T-***...stick to the day job son

This content is protected

:yep

 

:think please tell me more :blood

 

:yep:good post

 

His sparring vids show that he was much more than a crude brawler.