Calzaghe Fans: "Joe was better than Hagler"

are you going to answer my questions SLYK, you uneducated know nothing?

 

don't make me use you like the whipping boy i always make you into. you are a bore.

 

Joey boy never won a legit belt at Light Heavy.

 

nice way of trying to avoid the questions.

i know you too well, SLYK.

you shouldn't go around forums pretending that you know what you're talking about. eventually some one will make you look the fool.

answer the ****ing questions! :think

 

he was THE champ. not a belt holder. THE champ.

 

oh, and it's Ass a sin. not Assassin.

 

How? All he had was the ring belt.

 

looks like SLYK the dumb German has done a runner.

you're well suited to this forum.

 

either you talk sense, or go away. i won't put up with such stupidity.

 

Why's that mate? I've often wondered.

 

Two ATGs that is for sure. I loved watching both of them in action. In those days boxing was king of the hill. There was no MMA debate. You basically got your combat sport fix from boxing, or to a lesser extent: full contact karate or K1.

Hagler and Calzaghe were both supremle conditioned. Both had endless energy and no stamina issues. I would give Hagler the edge in the chin department although JC had some solid whiskers himself.

The outcome would come down to Calzaghe's freakish energy and punch output. He would bamboolzle Hagler whose pressure would not make the Welshman fold. Also, Calzaghe is the naturally larger man so the shots that vaporised Hearns and Caveman Lee would dent but not shatter Joe's jaw. Both were cagey, savy, could get dirty if needed. I don't envision an early stoppage here.

Close, hard fought UD for Calzaghe.

 

How many times will you get it wrong Dino. Its off the scale now.
Even without the point deduction, Calzaghe would have got the decision. Even without.
Calzaghe won that one clearly.
Also Reid was one of Franks fighers also

The fight was also in England. Reids country and not Wales.