What problem? He won easily. He ain't coming to please some computer nerds, he came to win, and he did. He knew exactly who was in front of him, and did exactly enough to safely win. He did the same to Donald, and to every body else. Just like he did when utterly dominating amateurs in all the competitions possible. Tell you what - if Wlad and Povetkin had been in amateurs at the same time, only one of them would be an Olympic champ - and it ain't Wlad. I am not telling he will dominate Wlad next year - but if he loses he will come back and win later. I fhis first pro loss is to Wlad - that's a hell of a lot better then to Ross Purrity, or Sanders. You can teach how to fight tall guys - you can not teach chin. And Wlad still fights bad on the back foot. It will not be a walk in the park for him.
Don't have to teach Klitschko anything about chins because he has never been counted out. If Povetkin got better training he wouldn't have to take a presumed losss. Klitschko has many flaws in his style and is easily beaten by the right opponent. So far Povetkin has not shown that he is the man for the job.
Byrd did the rope a dope not to **** up Povetkin's mind. He did it to make him tire. We can tallk a lot but Byrd is the one who has a lot of money and paid a team of professionals that worked for him. He definitely knew what were the best plans or stategies. So you're underrating the work of Byrd and his camp. They are professional athletes and obviously know more than what a fan can think.
Thank you. Eddie Chambers is a poor version of Chris Byrd with untested chin and equal to Byrd power. I personaly don't even think he can beat Brock let alone Povetkin.
Easily beaten by the right opponent??? Who might that be?:huh The only one that easily beat him was Sanders. What are you talking about?
Thats exactly what I said in a previous post, Chambers is a poor mans Chris Bryd. He probably wont beat Brock and even if he does, I cant see him beating Povetkin at all.
I am talking about a theorectical opponent who, at present, does not exist. Of course the basis of my arguement is Klitschko performing at his best. Anybody can beat him if he has another emotional breakdown.
Please lets stop with these useless theories - if Ali fogut Tyson or Tyson fought King Kong what would have happened. Lets concentrate on what we have on hands at present and what we should expect in the near future.
I really hope either Povetkin or Chagaev can dispute that. At least we will have competitive fights, rather than complete blow-outs.
I hope so too, but look how easily they got hit in their most recent fights. I am no fan of Klitschko but I am willing to give him credit for being able to hit a guy who is wide open.