Canelo Bivol rounds 1-4 - "close fight" comprehensively debunked debunked

Now I"m gonna refer you to some reddit threads so you understand how other people scored it. I'll start with this one. Read through it, then we'll go from there.

This content is protected

 

We're just getting started . . .

https://i.imgur.com/R6j7CJf.jpg

 

Next :

https://i.imgur.com/MBDZ08C.jpg

Do I need to continue, or do you get the picture? No one on Reddit agrees with your "you can't give Canelo rounds 1-3" argument. 116-112 is a very common score.

 

Guess not, I'll continue :

https://i.imgur.com/mFo9CrB.jpg

See a trend here Q?

 

4 or 5? Did you see the 19 likes? Shall I keep going? There's several topics with reactions all with 8-4 / 9-3 type scores who specifically address the first 4 rounds recognize they were all close and that many scored them for Canelo. You're laughing because you now are starting to get the picture. Your view is way outside the norm and it's not even close. Read these :

https://i.imgur.com/PRZ8v9R.jpg

This might be the only way to get through to you.

 

Right, and look at the %s in each of the first 4 rounds. Rounds 1 and 3 are abut 60 / 40 Bivol, Round 2 is about 50 / 50, Round 4 is about 60 / 40 Canelo. These even splits in rounds 1-4 completely destroy your argument.

If 1-4 were such clear Bivol rounds, they wouldn't all be that even now would they. The fans were clearly split on all of them.

 

The problem is Shadow as with the Flat Earth thread that was essentially me having my way with you for 60 pages without respite.
You selectively cherry pick one data point that supports your argument whilst ignoring the mass amount of data that counters your position. I said earlier to you that I'm not interested in casuals on social media. yes there will be some casuals on here however many are genuine boxing fans as they're active on a boxing forum. So although I might disagree with certain individuals on certain topics I understand that there's people who know more than me. I therefore weigh peoples assessment on here as being more informed than some twot on Reddit. Who might literelly be paid to shape the narrative. It's why I take those sources of information with a pinch of salt.

 

Once again, that poll proves that the fans were evenly split about who won rounds 1-4. So fans could not agree on who won those rounds which indicate that those rounds were close and hard to score Einstein. About half the fans who voted gave those rounds to Canelo, the other half to Bivol. You're arguing that you cannot give Round 1 to Canelo. About 40% of the fans disagree and gave it to Canelo dumbass lmao. About 50% of the fans gave Round 2 to Canelo, a round you say he had a poor case for. It's not a poor case if half the fans thought he won it. That's toss-up round territory.

 

One data point? Did you see the poll? Do you see that the first 4 rounds were evenly split amongst the fans as to who won each of those rounds? Please tell me you see that. I posted 4 pages of redditt comments many with likes indicate that the the majority agree that it was a 116-112 sort of fight. On the first page a post saying it was 116-112 had 19 likes. How many reactions saying the first 4 rounds were close or Canelo rounds do you need? How many comments saying they had it 116-112 do you need? Do we need to go to youtube comments next?