Canelo Bivol rounds 1-4 - "close fight" comprehensively debunked debunked

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Quina74, May 10, 2022.


  1. Quina74

    Quina74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,569
    4,470
    Apr 25, 2019
    I've already explained all of this.. I'm only going to be repeating myself

    You've cherrypicked one super slow video (which although cherrypicked shows It connect with Canelo's head past Canelo's parry and that Canelo doesn't move his head intentionally). I've used all videos and established it as a grounds for a somewhat snappy jab that jolts Canelo's head back.

    I've already explained to you from certain angles at super slow mo you CANNOT gauge impact.. I'm going to probably be rrepatign this for the nth time. Its getting v tiresome
     
  2. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,158
    9,884
    Aug 1, 2012
    Wow this is getting pretty crazy here. I'll defer to @ellerbe on these claims.

    So to review, we have Q claiming that Canelo's head "jolted" back from a love tap because that's what he sees from the DAZN angle, despite the fact that we clearly see on this angle that no such head jolt occurred :

    https://i.imgur.com/bOWdsW6.mp4

    And to make matters worse, we have @exocet76 refusing to address the "jolting" claim because he knows even he can't back Q on that after seeing it from the elevated side angle, but in an effort to find something to disagree with me on, now claims that this elevated angle shows the jab clearly landing, an idea that ellerbe has previously denied. Yikes.
     
  3. Quina74

    Quina74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,569
    4,470
    Apr 25, 2019
    @ellerbe
    This guy is ignoring all the videos I've posted and cherrypicked this singular one. I'm taking into account every video and have posted with explanations that confirms the punch connects and jolts Canelo's head back.

    Shadow has cherrypicked one super slow video (which although cherrypicked shows It connects with Canelo's head past Canelo's parry and that Canelo doesn't move his head intentionally). I've used all videos and established it as a grounds for a somewhat snappy jab that jolts Canelo's head back.

    I've already explained to Shadow thay from certain angles at super slow mo you CANNOT gauge impact

    Shadow you aren't even responding to any of my questions or any of my points and are simply saying stuff now. I've debunked it right in front of your eyes and you're still refusing to admit it was a scoring shot. I really can't help you from here
     
  4. exocet76

    exocet76 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,334
    17,555
    Feb 28, 2012
    You see Q this is what happens when someone talks out of there arse over time it get's broken down because they can't defend such a weak position. Shadow is persistant but comes from a flawed premise (fallacy) so he hopes that you give up in frustration so he can claim a hollow victory and that he was right all along. He will spin. reframe. use fallacies and just straight up tell lies. He will however break and will gave nowhere to go. You only have to see with this conversatiom starting with 7-5 was a fair score. the judges were right and it was a close fight.
    That was then reframed as the judges were right on the first 4 rounds that Canelo won. Then again another goal post shift to Canelo winning the first round. To now trying to get two non punches as scoring shot's. Shadow is already lost the war on this he's just too deluded and invested to realise it yet.
     
    Quina74 likes this.
  5. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,158
    9,884
    Aug 1, 2012
  6. Quina74

    Quina74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,569
    4,470
    Apr 25, 2019
    I know. I don't think I'll get an admittance that he is wrong.

    If I wasn't convinced that punch didn't land I'd be happy to admit it. Shadow on the other hand wouldn't. But it did, and it with absolute certainty moves Canelo's head back. It's hilarious how shadow calls the at best grazing shots (they barely look like they land even) as landed but cannot concede and admit that this punch from Bivol landed and was not a love tap.

    So close to just putting him on ignore if he can't admit to that @shadow111
     
    exocet76 likes this.
  7. exocet76

    exocet76 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,334
    17,555
    Feb 28, 2012
    It's irrelevant Shadow. the clip you provided shoes it being a scoring jab. you scored an own goal pal.
    Semantics don't mean anything when we are purely deciding on whether punches are scoring or not.
    The angle you provided is a clear scoring punch.
    Also you have no room to talk at all as you used hyperbole in describing the two GIF's you provided like "bounced" off his head and "moved Bivol back" so you literally need to pipe down because you exaggerated far worse.
     
  8. Quina74

    Quina74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,569
    4,470
    Apr 25, 2019
    @DoubleJab666 sorry to pull you in I'm sure you don't give a ****. But this is a cherrypicked video. I've explained why it's cherrypicked with you tagged in, in a previous post.

    @shadow111 you have no shame to pose such a dishonest yes or no question, just so you can appeal to someone. I've already debunked this bs.. Its your failure to acknowledge
     
  9. Quina74

    Quina74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,569
    4,470
    Apr 25, 2019
    Lying through your teeth ya weasel. I've debunked this through several videos and explanations. Why won't you acknowledge?
     
  10. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,158
    9,884
    Aug 1, 2012
    :facepalm:
    You told on yourself when you said that Bivol's love tap "jolts" Canelo's head back. This is a glaring error because we can all plainly see from the "other" angle that no head jolt back occurred. The fact that you thought that love tap jolted Canelo's head back tells us everything we need to know about you. And again, "cherrypicked" camera angles aren't a thing. We have 2 camera angles showing the exact same thing. A camera angle doesn't make someone's head jolt back from one angle but not the other. You have clearly overstepped your bounds and overplayed your hand on this one. Canelo's head didn't jolt back Q, we all can plainly see that from the overhead camera. That's why I posted that clip so when you started exaggerating and writing checks that your ass can't cash you'd be exposed. And that's exactly what happened. You think you saw his head jolt back in the DAZN angle because that's what you WANT to see.
     
  11. Quina74

    Quina74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,569
    4,470
    Apr 25, 2019
    @shadow111

    At this point shadow you aren't answering my points or questions. I've already demonstrated that the jab connected (fan you agree).. That it was somewhat snappy (can you agree) and that it snapped his head back (can you agree). The videos I've posted confirm the punch connects.. How can you disagree? Canelo's head moves back when Canelo's head is in a parrying position. You're trying to appeal to everyone with dishonest misleading questions.
     
  12. exocet76

    exocet76 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,334
    17,555
    Feb 28, 2012
    Look you won't get that admittance I just had the saisfaction of making him quit for weeks after giving him a drubbing.
    I've said several times in this thread that he lacks good faith because i know he ifnores evidence against him and oversells the weak crap he provides. It might come across like I'm a broken record but you have to hammer these points in.
    As I've siad that punch made contact but the initial angle was difficult to tell as it was head on with Canelo. the other angle though it's clear as day.
     
    Quina74 likes this.
  13. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,158
    9,884
    Aug 1, 2012
    You can't walk this one back. You stated that Canelo's head jolted back from that love tap. Now you're trying to walk it back saying his head only "moved" back because we can plainly see that it didn't jolt back from the overhead cam. It barely even connected if at all, at best it grazed his forehead as Canelo was blocking it and sweeping it aside, and you said it jolted his head back, like it landed hard. Unbelievable. Do you have any idea how ridiculous that sounds?
     
  14. Quina74

    Quina74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,569
    4,470
    Apr 25, 2019
    Shadow. You're well known for your dishonesty but this is getting a bit silly now.

    https://imgur.com/gallery/qdIIJD6

    Watch in full screen (I don't even know why I'm asking you to watch it tbh)

    Can you answer this simple question/line of logic below - Canelo clearly tries to parry the punch. But just because his glove moves toward Bivols doesn't mean Bivols jab does not connect (can you at least acknowledge this shadow)
    Again, I've explained this you're cherrypicking data
     
  15. Quina74

    Quina74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,569
    4,470
    Apr 25, 2019
    No it jolted back. And I've provided evidence. Move is just another word. It jolted back, it also moved back. You're just simply denying it for the sake of it.. To save face probably.

    It's OK to be wrong you weirdo