Canelo Bivol rounds 1-4 - "close fight" comprehensively debunked debunked

Not only that but it would be unhuman for the judges not to be influenced by a shoulder/bicep bomb like the one at the end of Round 1. With the round on the table, in a close round with neither guy landing much clean, a round like that is won by who finishes the round strong. You got one guy coming forward, pushing the action, you got the other guy getting backed up and roughed up on the ropes. That shot landing as it did would surely cause the judges to give him the round, followed up by the uppercut after that. Total bossing and brutal heavier punching done there by Canelo at the end of Round 1 wins him the round.

 

"Biceps bomb" is the funniest thing I've heard on this forum in some time.

 

I think so, and apparently so did the official judges.

 

The judges saw what they saw, they all gave Round 1 to Canelo after the heavy attacks on Bivol at the end of the round. The shoulder/bicep bomb with Bivol on the ropes was a part of why that round was scored as it was.

 

Appeal to authority fallacy.
You have been completely wrecked Shadow.....AGAIN.
This is what happens when you start on a false premise.
It get's pulled apart with ease by myself.....
So I'll keep on asking this Shadow because you are ducking for a reason.
Do you now admit that arm punches are none scoring as per the rules?
Yes or no is sufficient.
If you don't answer then you conceed this and your position collapses.
Ignore it and I will keep spamming until you vanish for a few weeks after another complete drubbing.

 

Appeal to authority fallacy you dimwit.

 

Another fallacy Shadow....the judges are aware unlike you that arm punches are not scoring so it's irrelevent.
Bivol lands far more cleaner punches end of conversation.

 

Nice framing, so if I don't agree with you, then you automatically win. Funny how that works.

All 3 judges gave the round to Canelo, if you have issuse with that, that's your problem. I am very satisfied with the clips and analysis I've provided which have supported the judges scores of the round. As it pertains to the rules of what is considered a scoring blow, nowhere in the rules of boxing does it say that shoulder/bicep punches can't be counted as scoring blows, and you yourself said that they can count in terms of effective aggression which is a scoring criteria last time I checked. You're in a bad way with how I'm ragdolling you. Your corner should really throw in the towel on you, you're taking a lot of damage. @Quina74 you gonna let your man take this kind of punishment?

 

Oh really is that so. Why don't you prove it. (psssst you can't)

The same judges who you say are aware that arm punches are not scoring just so happened to score the round for Canelo. And even according to you, that shoulder/bicep bomb can strengthen effective aggression which is a part of the scoring. So yeah clearly that shot can be "scored" even in your funny little mind.

 

It isn't framing you fanny when it's a provable and observed you complete cretin.
You are completely out of you depth Shadow.
Do I have to explain what a fallacy is to you AGAIN?
Do I then have to explain what appeal to authority fallacy means AGAIN?
You have actually now gone full circle back to the begining.
You have been destroyed Shadow as the appeal to authority is what you used at the start of this conversation in saying the judges score of 7-5 was fair and that the dight was very close.
Just like the flat earth thread you've gone full circle and are repeating points that have already been destroyed.
Time to log off Shadow you've been up fighting this for two weeks.
You've been exposed again as a mental case.

 

That's all you can do at this point shadow. One fallacy after another and you still can't answer can you?
You've been beaten here pal. nowhere to go.