You asked for it silly goose. I set traps for you, you walk into them. Here we go. Now what'ya gonna say : https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/opinions-on-canelo-ggg-1-2.658955/ Post #10 by Mendoza. "The vast major of ring cards say GGG won the first fight." . . . followed by a list of press scores favoring GGG and a debate over press scores.
So you have searched high and low to produce one person who mentions the press scores......just to try and support your position... Again you appeal to authority which is a clear fallacy.... You are nowhere near smart enough to 'set traps' as I've clowned you in Canelo and Flat Earth threads every time without exception making you run away after being consistently dismantled. Showing one person when I clearly stated that the majority of people did not use that weak and flawed reasoning just cements your demented logic. This forum has 1000's of regular users yet you can only find one that supports your demented position? This is on a similar level to the Stanley Kubrick video you posted claiming the moon landings were fake.....only for me to instantly ragdoll you with reality. You never learn..
Oh please. There's tons more examples of that. If I find more, then you'll start glitching out and talking more gimmerish about how I didn't just prove what I said to be true which I just did.
Why are you this demented? Like I said even if you show 10 people saying the same thing this is still a site that has 1000's of active users. So your very premise is completely false as it doesn't represent what most people think. It doesn't mean either what most think is fact...I'm just pointing out that people were judging from what they saw and not press scores.. In fact the only imbecile raising this as an argument is you yourself.... So you are projecting a fallacy argument just let that sink in...
@exocet76 Here's some more for you : https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/ggg-canelo-media-scorecards-compubox.593770/ Topic about press scores, posters responding to press scores as proof of a "robbery". https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/media-scorecards-canelo-ggg-2.614973/ Topic about press scores for Fight 2 being used to support the idea that GGG won. Is that enough for you?
LOL now you're moving the goalposts. First you said I lied bout it and couldn't produce examples. Then I post 1, you're like it's only 1 person lol. Then I post more, now even if I post 10 examples it's not enough. You clown lol. You accusing me of lying then me producing the goods showing that what I said was true, then you glitching out and talking gibberish is getting old.
@exocet76 see this, how BCS8 is trying to suggest that GGG won the series if we go by press scores? This is exactly why I'm making this topic, because of how often "press scores" were used over the last 2 years to suggest GGG won the first 2 fights. Get it now? But you're trying to claim here that this "press scoring" argument was never used by GGG after the first 2 fights lmao.
You're the one who brought up the press scores as legitimate barometers. You're the one that has the 2-1 problem BY YOUR OWN STANDARDS.
BCS : "Going by press scores, GGG won the first 2 fights". exo: "Why are you talking about press scores, they're irrelevant."
LOL @ press scores as "legitimate barometers". But all those times GGG fans brought up press scores of the first 2 fights, they weren't being used as "legitimate barometers" then? Funny how that works lol.
You've literally produced one comment against 1000's maybe 10000's of users and you think that's a proof? You are a mental case that seeks attention yet you are not mentally competent again because you always start from a false premise. You also accuse me of things I've accused you of. The difference is I support my position with clear evidence you just spout bollocks. You are genuinely dimwitted despite you thinking the opposite. Your ascertain here is that the majority of people were using the press scores to support their position. I clearly stated multiple times that your ascerion is false as a fallacy which it is....you then provide a single post after searching for some time. It's still an appeal to authority regardless of how you try and spin it...you complete mong.
Jesus, give it up. There's a long list of comments in each of those topics I linked of posters giving the press scores credibility, there's numerous examples there of the press scores not just being used to suggest GGG won, but to even go one step further to suggest that each fight was a robbery lol. Do you have any idea how many times the press scores were not only listed, but how many times GGG fans converted all the press scores into %s to show the %s of how many in the press had GGG winning. The evidence of press scores being used over the last 5 years is overwhelming, it's not just limited to those topics. Press scores were cited in direct response to me so many times I lost count. If I really went digging you'd be completely disabled in this discussion. This isn't even debatable how often press scores were used over the last 5 years to argue GGG won each fight or to suggest that each fight was a robbery. You must have been living under a rock to not be aware of how often press scores were used.
You are conflating cand assigning greater meaning to something that is merely supporting a position. So let me clearly state the same point AGAIN. The vast majority of people are basing their opinion based on what they saw in the fight. You like a complete spastic are then trying to reframe and suggest that the press scores are the sole pivot point in the argument. Do you see the problem with this type of reasoning? Or am I having to ragdoll you for the umpteenth time? I know you are an attention seeking mentaloid but still...try harder.
Which is all I'm doing here. Listing the press scores as others have done in the past. Why do you have a problem with me doing exactly what others have done in the past? Why are the press scores this time so triggering for you? (I think I know why)